Re: for the record

Quote
dzrams
I don't know that anyone is saying that Goff couldn't be where Stafford is in 5 years. The Stafford today is better than 5 year Stafford.

But if I take your statement above at face value, doesn't that mean that Stafford's experience enables him to process faster?

ME: "I think Stafford has experience over Goff--which some people are mistaking for other stuff (eg. who processes faster). Experienced qbs who are still physically in their prime add a lot to your team, BUT that in itself guarantees nothing".

And do we mistake that for a claim that Goff declined? If you don't agree with the idea that Goff suffered a 2 year decline, why not respond to all the posters who claim that IS what happened?

If you;re asking me if the trade was a good idea, I have a complicated answer to that but can shorten it to a sound byte. Namely, this. Regardless of what I think of the trade, Stafford is such a good acquisition it makes (for me anyway) the whole question moot.

...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/23/2021 02:44PM by zn.