Quote
zn
Quote
znDo you have a valid argument in response to that?
....
Quote
Rams43
We are talking past each other. I, and others, have listed overwhelming facts and stats but you just ignore them and plow ahead while repeating your same 2-3 talking points.
I’m gonna take a break talking to you on this particular subject. Peace. I’m out...
The answer to my question was...I guess not.
I showed you the problem with your "overwhelming stats" but you don't seem to be able to answer the challenge.
Your "overwhelming stats" hide something. 2 games stick out as disasters that inflate the numbers.
If those 2 games are a crisis that came, got fixed, and went, then your "overwhelming stats" just paint a false picture.
Now is there any reason to NOT see those 2 games as a crisis that came, got fixed, and went?
I don't get answers to that. What I get is personal attacks, pile ons, jokes, and...no argument.
....
It's called cherry-picking. You want to discount the bad but somehow won't accept a 41 game sample. 41 games allows for good outliers, bad outliers and establishes a CLEAR picture of what has become. Those two games don't sway the almost 3 years worth of games that drastically. Or at all, really.
80.3 rating during that timespan is AWFUL. Blaming everything under the sun except for Goff illustrates an agenda. If you aren't willing to face reality then it is you that has the problem. Not everyone else as you so often try and suggest. The numbers are clear, yes, everyone else watches the games and no, no one needs you to re-define or re-interpret their own words for them.