Quote
dzrams
The problem with basing things on recent games is we don't know if the purported improvement is an actual thing or just a temporary blip.
Which is the temporary blip though? The 2 games with 7 turnovers? Why isn't that a temporary blip?
Then there's the other number, which is 3 INTs in 6 games including 2 playoff games with none. As compared to 2 games with 7 which you take as indicative (for reasons you don't explain), what that set of games is like is another set--all games in 2020 combined minus the 2 bad games. So with that it's 10 TOs including 9 INts in 15 games.
In order for you to believe what you believe, you have to take 2 games with 7 turnovers as more real (and not a blip) than either the set of 6 games with 3 or set of 15 games with 10.
You don;t explain why you throw around the (virtually always phony) "sample size" argument when you are taking a set of TWO games as indicative or more real.
So you take the set of 2 games with 7 turnovers as real and not a blip. Okay. But. WHY. What is your reasoning for that.
And here's what I say you're not seeing in games and I also say if you go back and watch them you will. The 2 bad turnover games came from pressing and trying to make play under bad circumstances, when the better thing would be to take the sack, bail on the play, run (and slide) throw it away. Which, since then, is what he is doing. Watch. It's there.
....