Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

Anonymous User
June 02, 2021 02:45PM
Quote
PHDram
You dont buy mine or other versions of what happened and I don't buy yours. Yours is substantially based on a single story by thirry which NO ONE else has corroborated.

In contrast we have years of observational evidence of seeing mcvay navigate the complexities of the nfl including his past and present relationships with coaches and players which provides zero evidence indicating mcvay to be a bad person or coach.

I'll take the preponderance of evidence over 1 story as my insight into mcvays personality. You choose not to...thats fine with me. I'm not policing you. Post whatever you want.

Further you continue to talk about THE WAY the divorce occurred. IMO thats a non story. I watched both videos and the nastiness you attribute to both mcvay and snead just wasn't there. That's MY opinion. If yours is different again that's fine. But thats YOUR opinion. Not fact.

I was one of the biggest Goff supporters on this board prior to him being drafted and continued to post my support after the 2018 season late season skid and his lackluster play vs the Patriots in the SB.

After I watched the 2019 season several times, I had seen enough. I still held out hope but I raised the white flag after his 2020 season.

I will root for Jared to succeed because he was one of my top 3 all time first round draft picks in the last 30 years.

I don't understand the support & excuses for Goff's issues in 2019 & 2020.

Nobody is going to change my mind unless Stafford looks more of the same in 2021 & 2022. If that happens I will eat my plate of crow.

I was elated the second I heard the Rams traded for Stafford. It still sometimes feels like a dream until I see Stafford do interviews as a Ram or see the OTA pictures with him as our starting QB.

Like you said. Just my opinion. I could end up being wrong but after watching all the games again from 2019 & 2020, I couldnt be more happy with the addition of Stat Padford.


Rob Parker Rips Matthew Stafford: 'Meet Stat Padford'
Former Detroit sports writer Rob Parker rips Matthew Stafford.

FEB 1, 2021
Despite the excitement felt by many in Detroit that former quarterback Matthew Stafford is finally playing on a good football team, he will always have his fair share of critics.

As his career progressed, Detroit's former No. 1 overall draft pick earned the not-so-flattering nickname of "Stat Padford."

It came to represent and diminish his statistical accomplishments that occurred during games in which Detroit was trailing.

Former Detroit sports writer Rob Parker encouraged fans of the Los Angeles Rams to hold off on planning a parade for winning the Lombardi Trophy.

"I call him 'Stat Padford.' If you’re being honest about his career, it fits. People in Motown are in tears -- tears of joy, that is -- that the Lions finally dumped him.

In fact, if COVID-19 wasn’t still gripping folks, there probably would have been a parade down Woodward on Sunday," Parker wrote in his latest column for Deadspin.

"And the people on the Left Coast, and around NFL America, just haven’t watched close enough to know what the Rams are in for."

The reasons critics give are quite valid.

The Lions only made the playoffs on three occasions in his 12 seasons with Detroit, and they went 0-3 as a wild card entrant.

The biggest indictment Parker provides is that from his observations of the NFL, "The top QBs seem to be able to single-handedly win a game on talent alone."

To critics, Stafford never raised his game to that proverbial next level.
[www.si.com]




SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Matthew Stafford airing it out, other observations from Rams OTAs

RamBill1663June 02, 2021 05:16AM

  The consistency that he comes in to work with

PHDram339June 02, 2021 05:40AM

  Thats the first thing that came to mind...

Atlantic Ram582June 02, 2021 06:58AM

  Re: The consistency that he comes in to work with

Rampage2K-265June 02, 2021 08:49AM

  Re: The consistency that he comes in to work with

dzrams358June 02, 2021 09:06AM

  Re: The consistency that he comes in to work with

moklerman237June 02, 2021 12:33PM

  yes but

zn380June 02, 2021 09:57AM

  i dont buy it.

PHDram304June 02, 2021 10:20AM

  Re: i dont buy it.

Rampage2K-365June 02, 2021 10:43AM

  Re: i dont buy it.

dzrams205June 02, 2021 10:51AM

  Re: i dont buy it.

Rampage2K-194June 02, 2021 11:03AM

  Agree 100%

stlramz152June 04, 2021 01:35PM

  Re: i dont buy it.

zn217June 02, 2021 11:14AM

  Perhaps you misread?

PHDram258June 02, 2021 01:29PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread?

moklerman203June 02, 2021 02:22PM

  Exactly

PHDram213June 02, 2021 02:37PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread?

Coy Bacon313June 02, 2021 02:54PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread?

zn320June 03, 2021 06:13AM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

Anonymous User389June 02, 2021 02:45PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

zn209June 02, 2021 03:01PM

  Can't agree more PHDram: Sorry zn: No change here on my end

Anonymous User238June 02, 2021 03:49PM

  Re: Can't agree more PHDram: Sorry zn: No change here on my end

SoCalRAMatic318June 02, 2021 04:28PM

  Re: Can't agree more PHDram: Sorry zn: No change here on my end

zn173June 02, 2021 05:43PM

  The problem with the 4 game argument

PHDram188June 02, 2021 06:36PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

dzrams169June 02, 2021 07:07PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

zn152June 03, 2021 06:21AM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

dzrams155June 03, 2021 11:10AM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

moklerman186June 03, 2021 11:19AM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

JYB160June 04, 2021 12:30PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

dzrams159June 04, 2021 01:02PM

  And . . .

stlramz137June 04, 2021 02:04PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

PHDram163June 03, 2021 11:24AM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

moklerman147June 03, 2021 12:24PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

PHDram138June 03, 2021 12:43PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

moklerman243June 03, 2021 03:51PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

zn179June 03, 2021 04:24PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

moklerman177June 03, 2021 05:54PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

Coy Bacon175June 04, 2021 01:08PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

zn195June 04, 2021 01:47PM

  There's little to no hyperbole

moklerman140June 04, 2021 08:01PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

dzrams192June 03, 2021 06:25PM

  The problem with the 4 game argument: Well spoken dzrams

Anonymous User177June 04, 2021 02:20PM

  Re: Can't agree more PHDram: Sorry zn: No change here on my end

PHDram202June 02, 2021 06:41PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

PHDram268June 02, 2021 06:26PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

george_allen194June 03, 2021 05:02PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

zn170June 03, 2021 05:13PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

george_allen179June 03, 2021 06:02PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

zn175June 03, 2021 06:29PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

george_allen186June 04, 2021 06:29PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

Coy Bacon166June 04, 2021 01:00PM

  Stafford seems to ‘see the field’ better than Goff...

Rams43284June 02, 2021 10:32AM

  Re: Stafford seems to ‘see the field’ better than Goff...

zn305June 02, 2021 10:37AM

  Re: Stafford seems to ‘see the field’ better than Goff...

dzrams388June 02, 2021 10:39AM

  Re: Stafford seems to ‘see the field’ better than Goff...

PHDram314June 02, 2021 10:49AM

  True, but...

moklerman329June 04, 2021 08:09PM