Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

June 03, 2021 05:13PM
Quote
george_allen
Quote
Florida_Ram
Rob Parker Rips Matthew Stafford: 'Meet Stat Padford'

"I call him 'Stat Padford.' If you’re being honest about his career, it fits. People in Motown are in tears -- tears of joy, that is -- that the Lions finally dumped him.

"And the people on the Left Coast, and around NFL America, just haven’t watched close enough to know what the Rams are in for."

The Lions only made the playoffs on three occasions in his 12 seasons with Detroit, and they went 0-3 as a wild card entrant.

The biggest indictment Parker provides is that from his observations of the NFL, "The top QBs seem to be able to single-handedly win a game on talent alone."

To critics, Stafford never raised his game to that proverbial next level.

@ Rob Parker:
really? is that true that motown was in tears of joy when the lions "dumped" stafford? I hadn't seen that anywhere else . . .

i don't think archie manning made the playoffs at all while all his years with the saints. was he a crappy qb? i didn't think so having watched him those years. i chalked it up to a historically bad organization at the time. which i think stafford has also been in, at the time.

a qb can single-handedly win a game on talent alone? -based on that, patrick maholmes sucks based on the last sb. ok rob.

I agree with you on all that.

Put a top qb in basic to good circumstances and the offense can do well.

But I can't think of any qb who makes up for huge deficiencies. Archie is a good example.

....
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Matthew Stafford airing it out, other observations from Rams OTAs

RamBill1663June 02, 2021 05:16AM

  The consistency that he comes in to work with

PHDram339June 02, 2021 05:40AM

  Thats the first thing that came to mind...

Atlantic Ram582June 02, 2021 06:58AM

  Re: The consistency that he comes in to work with

Rampage2K-265June 02, 2021 08:49AM

  Re: The consistency that he comes in to work with

dzrams358June 02, 2021 09:06AM

  Re: The consistency that he comes in to work with

moklerman237June 02, 2021 12:33PM

  yes but

zn380June 02, 2021 09:57AM

  i dont buy it.

PHDram304June 02, 2021 10:20AM

  Re: i dont buy it.

Rampage2K-365June 02, 2021 10:43AM

  Re: i dont buy it.

dzrams205June 02, 2021 10:51AM

  Re: i dont buy it.

Rampage2K-194June 02, 2021 11:03AM

  Agree 100%

stlramz152June 04, 2021 01:35PM

  Re: i dont buy it.

zn217June 02, 2021 11:14AM

  Perhaps you misread?

PHDram258June 02, 2021 01:29PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread?

moklerman204June 02, 2021 02:22PM

  Exactly

PHDram213June 02, 2021 02:37PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread?

Coy Bacon313June 02, 2021 02:54PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread?

zn320June 03, 2021 06:13AM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

Anonymous User390June 02, 2021 02:45PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

zn209June 02, 2021 03:01PM

  Can't agree more PHDram: Sorry zn: No change here on my end

Anonymous User238June 02, 2021 03:49PM

  Re: Can't agree more PHDram: Sorry zn: No change here on my end

SoCalRAMatic319June 02, 2021 04:28PM

  Re: Can't agree more PHDram: Sorry zn: No change here on my end

zn173June 02, 2021 05:43PM

  The problem with the 4 game argument

PHDram188June 02, 2021 06:36PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

dzrams169June 02, 2021 07:07PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

zn152June 03, 2021 06:21AM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

dzrams155June 03, 2021 11:10AM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

moklerman186June 03, 2021 11:19AM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

JYB160June 04, 2021 12:30PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

dzrams159June 04, 2021 01:02PM

  And . . .

stlramz137June 04, 2021 02:04PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

PHDram163June 03, 2021 11:24AM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

moklerman147June 03, 2021 12:24PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

PHDram138June 03, 2021 12:43PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

moklerman243June 03, 2021 03:51PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

zn180June 03, 2021 04:24PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

moklerman177June 03, 2021 05:54PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

Coy Bacon175June 04, 2021 01:08PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

zn195June 04, 2021 01:47PM

  There's little to no hyperbole

moklerman140June 04, 2021 08:01PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

dzrams192June 03, 2021 06:25PM

  The problem with the 4 game argument: Well spoken dzrams

Anonymous User177June 04, 2021 02:20PM

  Re: Can't agree more PHDram: Sorry zn: No change here on my end

PHDram202June 02, 2021 06:41PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

PHDram268June 02, 2021 06:26PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

george_allen194June 03, 2021 05:02PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

zn170June 03, 2021 05:13PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

george_allen179June 03, 2021 06:02PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

zn175June 03, 2021 06:29PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

george_allen186June 04, 2021 06:29PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

Coy Bacon166June 04, 2021 01:00PM

  Stafford seems to ‘see the field’ better than Goff...

Rams43284June 02, 2021 10:32AM

  Re: Stafford seems to ‘see the field’ better than Goff...

zn305June 02, 2021 10:37AM

  Re: Stafford seems to ‘see the field’ better than Goff...

dzrams388June 02, 2021 10:39AM

  Re: Stafford seems to ‘see the field’ better than Goff...

PHDram314June 02, 2021 10:49AM

  True, but...

moklerman329June 04, 2021 08:09PM