Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

June 03, 2021 03:51PM
Quote
PHDram
Lol. Well I get your point but he did help bring consistent winning football back to the rams as well as a super bowl appearance. So I think there was more good then bad but I do get your point.
I've often wondered what might have happened if he'd been hurt or not even drafted. What would McVay's Rams have been like? At least record-wise? Whatever benefit Goff was bringing in '17-'18 I think is counter-balanced by his seeming regression. On top of that, what if the Rams hadn't gone for the splash move and just kept their picks in '16? Who would be on the team that they had to give up to even get Goff?

I understand that I am firmly on the con side of the Goff conversation but I think these are legitimate questions to ponder. I honestly think that McVay, with just about any available QB of his choosing(instead of inheriting Goff) would have done just as well. But with more draft picks.

Out of curiosity, since I'd be terrible at figuring it all out, I Googled it and someone already explored the idea:
[www.turfshowtimes.com]



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/03/2021 04:01PM by moklerman.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Matthew Stafford airing it out, other observations from Rams OTAs

RamBill1664June 02, 2021 05:16AM

  The consistency that he comes in to work with

PHDram339June 02, 2021 05:40AM

  Thats the first thing that came to mind...

Atlantic Ram584June 02, 2021 06:58AM

  Re: The consistency that he comes in to work with

Rampage2K-265June 02, 2021 08:49AM

  Re: The consistency that he comes in to work with

dzrams359June 02, 2021 09:06AM

  Re: The consistency that he comes in to work with

moklerman238June 02, 2021 12:33PM

  yes but

zn381June 02, 2021 09:57AM

  i dont buy it.

PHDram304June 02, 2021 10:20AM

  Re: i dont buy it.

Rampage2K-365June 02, 2021 10:43AM

  Re: i dont buy it.

dzrams205June 02, 2021 10:51AM

  Re: i dont buy it.

Rampage2K-195June 02, 2021 11:03AM

  Agree 100%

stlramz153June 04, 2021 01:35PM

  Re: i dont buy it.

zn218June 02, 2021 11:14AM

  Perhaps you misread?

PHDram258June 02, 2021 01:29PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread?

moklerman204June 02, 2021 02:22PM

  Exactly

PHDram213June 02, 2021 02:37PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread?

Coy Bacon313June 02, 2021 02:54PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread?

zn320June 03, 2021 06:13AM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

Anonymous User391June 02, 2021 02:45PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

zn210June 02, 2021 03:01PM

  Can't agree more PHDram: Sorry zn: No change here on my end

Anonymous User240June 02, 2021 03:49PM

  Re: Can't agree more PHDram: Sorry zn: No change here on my end

SoCalRAMatic319June 02, 2021 04:28PM

  Re: Can't agree more PHDram: Sorry zn: No change here on my end

zn174June 02, 2021 05:43PM

  The problem with the 4 game argument

PHDram188June 02, 2021 06:36PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

dzrams170June 02, 2021 07:07PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

zn153June 03, 2021 06:21AM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

dzrams155June 03, 2021 11:10AM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

moklerman187June 03, 2021 11:19AM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

JYB161June 04, 2021 12:30PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

dzrams160June 04, 2021 01:02PM

  And . . .

stlramz137June 04, 2021 02:04PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

PHDram163June 03, 2021 11:24AM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

moklerman147June 03, 2021 12:24PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

PHDram138June 03, 2021 12:43PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

moklerman243June 03, 2021 03:51PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

zn180June 03, 2021 04:24PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

moklerman178June 03, 2021 05:54PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

Coy Bacon176June 04, 2021 01:08PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

zn196June 04, 2021 01:47PM

  There's little to no hyperbole

moklerman140June 04, 2021 08:01PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

dzrams192June 03, 2021 06:25PM

  The problem with the 4 game argument: Well spoken dzrams

Anonymous User177June 04, 2021 02:20PM

  Re: Can't agree more PHDram: Sorry zn: No change here on my end

PHDram202June 02, 2021 06:41PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

PHDram268June 02, 2021 06:26PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

george_allen196June 03, 2021 05:02PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

zn171June 03, 2021 05:13PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

george_allen179June 03, 2021 06:02PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

zn176June 03, 2021 06:29PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

george_allen187June 04, 2021 06:29PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

Coy Bacon166June 04, 2021 01:00PM

  Stafford seems to ‘see the field’ better than Goff...

Rams43285June 02, 2021 10:32AM

  Re: Stafford seems to ‘see the field’ better than Goff...

zn305June 02, 2021 10:37AM

  Re: Stafford seems to ‘see the field’ better than Goff...

dzrams388June 02, 2021 10:39AM

  Re: Stafford seems to ‘see the field’ better than Goff...

PHDram314June 02, 2021 10:49AM

  True, but...

moklerman330June 04, 2021 08:09PM