Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: i dont buy it.

June 02, 2021 10:43AM
Quote
PHDram
you seem to want us to believe that mcvay is some sort of belligerent temperamental child who unjustifiably criticized his qb. seems hard to believe, i dont buy it. there is zero evidence of this other than 1 report by thiry. why you would choose to believe that 1 report other than the years of observation is beyond me. its much more likely that mcvay grew frustrated with goff's inconsistency/lack of progress which ultimately lead to the breakup.

I think it was the perfect storm so to speak....if Stafford doesn't become available, Goff is still our QB1 and McVay is going to sink or swim with him....I didn't like the way Goff was treated by McVay and Snead at the end after what that kid has done for this team and community, but that's how they chose to handle it, I'm sure he has heard from some close to him that it wasn't the greatest look
and he is smart enough to realize it

I think McVay is a bit impatient and sees his window closing on this defense and figured getting a 13 year vet with the talent like Stafford is our best chance of winning the Super Bowl, can't really blame him for thinking that and respect the fact that he is going to do what ever it takes to get back to the dance....He knows the pressure this puts him under after making such a bold move and seems to be ok with that. It has to payoff with a ring imo, but that's just me and my own perfectionist impatience....spin tounge smiley



[www.instagram.com]
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Matthew Stafford airing it out, other observations from Rams OTAs

RamBill1665June 02, 2021 05:16AM

  The consistency that he comes in to work with

PHDram340June 02, 2021 05:40AM

  Thats the first thing that came to mind...

Atlantic Ram584June 02, 2021 06:58AM

  Re: The consistency that he comes in to work with

Rampage2K-265June 02, 2021 08:49AM

  Re: The consistency that he comes in to work with

dzrams359June 02, 2021 09:06AM

  Re: The consistency that he comes in to work with

moklerman238June 02, 2021 12:33PM

  yes but

zn382June 02, 2021 09:57AM

  i dont buy it.

PHDram304June 02, 2021 10:20AM

  Re: i dont buy it.

Rampage2K-365June 02, 2021 10:43AM

  Re: i dont buy it.

dzrams205June 02, 2021 10:51AM

  Re: i dont buy it.

Rampage2K-195June 02, 2021 11:03AM

  Agree 100%

stlramz153June 04, 2021 01:35PM

  Re: i dont buy it.

zn218June 02, 2021 11:14AM

  Perhaps you misread?

PHDram258June 02, 2021 01:29PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread?

moklerman204June 02, 2021 02:22PM

  Exactly

PHDram214June 02, 2021 02:37PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread?

Coy Bacon314June 02, 2021 02:54PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread?

zn322June 03, 2021 06:13AM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

Anonymous User391June 02, 2021 02:45PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

zn210June 02, 2021 03:01PM

  Can't agree more PHDram: Sorry zn: No change here on my end

Anonymous User240June 02, 2021 03:49PM

  Re: Can't agree more PHDram: Sorry zn: No change here on my end

SoCalRAMatic319June 02, 2021 04:28PM

  Re: Can't agree more PHDram: Sorry zn: No change here on my end

zn174June 02, 2021 05:43PM

  The problem with the 4 game argument

PHDram188June 02, 2021 06:36PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

dzrams170June 02, 2021 07:07PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

zn153June 03, 2021 06:21AM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

dzrams155June 03, 2021 11:10AM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

moklerman187June 03, 2021 11:19AM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

JYB161June 04, 2021 12:30PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

dzrams160June 04, 2021 01:02PM

  And . . .

stlramz138June 04, 2021 02:04PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

PHDram164June 03, 2021 11:24AM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

moklerman147June 03, 2021 12:24PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

PHDram138June 03, 2021 12:43PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

moklerman244June 03, 2021 03:51PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

zn181June 03, 2021 04:24PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

moklerman179June 03, 2021 05:54PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

Coy Bacon176June 04, 2021 01:08PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

zn196June 04, 2021 01:47PM

  There's little to no hyperbole

moklerman141June 04, 2021 08:01PM

  Re: The problem with the 4 game argument

dzrams192June 03, 2021 06:25PM

  The problem with the 4 game argument: Well spoken dzrams

Anonymous User178June 04, 2021 02:20PM

  Re: Can't agree more PHDram: Sorry zn: No change here on my end

PHDram202June 02, 2021 06:41PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

PHDram268June 02, 2021 06:26PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

george_allen196June 03, 2021 05:02PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

zn171June 03, 2021 05:13PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

george_allen179June 03, 2021 06:02PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

zn176June 03, 2021 06:29PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

george_allen188June 04, 2021 06:29PM

  Re: Perhaps you misread? I can't agree more PHDram

Coy Bacon166June 04, 2021 01:00PM

  Stafford seems to ‘see the field’ better than Goff...

Rams43286June 02, 2021 10:32AM

  Re: Stafford seems to ‘see the field’ better than Goff...

zn305June 02, 2021 10:37AM

  Re: Stafford seems to ‘see the field’ better than Goff...

dzrams389June 02, 2021 10:39AM

  Re: Stafford seems to ‘see the field’ better than Goff...

PHDram314June 02, 2021 10:49AM

  True, but...

moklerman330June 04, 2021 08:09PM