Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: no this is objective

July 21, 2021 12:13PM
Quote
AlbaNY_Ram
What does Henderson have going for him, then: he averaged 4.5 ypc last year while Akers averaged 4.3 ...

Speed, explosion, GREAT contact balance. He's a very good "one move and gone" RB. I defended the Henderson pick when it happened though it was with the understanding he was a complementary back. People debated his size at one point but that's not relevant--he's lowbuilt and tough so his size is just not an issue. It might be for a skinnier back who doesn't have Henderson's build. The fact that you're even asking this question makes me wonder if you're taking things wrong (I suspect you are). Henderson is not Aker's equal in talent, which for some reason appears to come across as "Henderson's no good." (???)

In terms of ypc, you are being misled by numbers instead of looking at the player. Henderson is less adept at Akers at making something happen in traffic---elusiveness. There's a reason Akers was highly productive in college behind one of the (if not THE) worst OLs in college football. People say, it's the scheme and blocking. For the most part, true. But for Akers it's also more than that. He has a knack for producing even when it looks like nothing's there. So with Akers you have a good running game based on scheme and blocking PLUS more than that. That's just simply not as true with Henderson.

There are 7 games in 2020 where DH did not produce for various reasons, so as of right now he doesn't have the pedigree of a primary back because he's not quite consistent enough.

Now maybe he can improve on that. I don't rule it out.

....
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Size

SoCalRAMatic694July 20, 2021 09:51AM

  No diss on size he's big enough

alyoshamucci231July 20, 2021 09:55AM

  All the more reason to bring in a guy like Peterson...

roman18163July 20, 2021 10:20AM

  Re: Size

3030146July 20, 2021 10:01AM

  Re: Size

HornsUpRamily!119July 20, 2021 10:04AM

  He has shown he can't do the job

merlin204July 20, 2021 10:10AM

  Re: He has shown he can't do the job

dzrams131July 20, 2021 10:27AM

  Re: He has shown he can't do the job Attachments

AlbaNY_Ram145July 20, 2021 10:40AM

  Re: He has shown he can't do the job

dzrams130July 20, 2021 10:49AM

  I base what I say here

merlin110July 20, 2021 12:26PM

  Re: I base what I say here

dzrams98July 20, 2021 01:11PM

  Re: I base what I say here

SoCalRAMatic97July 20, 2021 01:25PM

  Re: I base what I say here

zn100July 20, 2021 08:03PM

  Agree: Akers is superb at making something out of nothing

BC Ramsfan92July 20, 2021 08:26PM

  Yes DZ but Success Rate doesn't tell this entire story

merlin114July 20, 2021 07:12PM

  Re: Yes DZ but Success Rate doesn't tell this entire story

dzrams87July 20, 2021 07:36PM

  Re: Yes DZ but Success Rate doesn't tell this entire story

zn84July 20, 2021 07:57PM

  Re: Yes DZ but Success Rate doesn't tell this entire story

dzrams96July 20, 2021 08:07PM

  Re: Yes DZ but Success Rate doesn't tell this entire story

zn93July 20, 2021 09:17PM

  Re: Yes DZ but Success Rate doesn't tell this entire story

dzrams91July 20, 2021 10:10PM

  no this is objective

zn103July 20, 2021 10:21PM

  Re: no this is objective

dzrams90July 21, 2021 11:23AM

  Re: no this is objective

zn88July 21, 2021 11:45AM

  Re: no this is objective

AlbaNY_Ram80July 21, 2021 11:51AM

  Re: no this is objective

zn96July 21, 2021 12:13PM

  Subjective vs. Objective

moklerman80July 21, 2021 12:58PM

  Re: Subjective vs. Objective

dzrams75July 21, 2021 01:20PM

  Re: Subjective vs. Objective

zn84July 21, 2021 01:39PM

  Re: Subjective vs. Objective

moklerman77July 21, 2021 01:58PM

  Re: Subjective vs. Objective

dzrams104July 21, 2021 02:02PM

  Re: Subjective vs. Objective

zn99July 21, 2021 03:36PM

  Re: Subjective vs. Objective

moklerman73July 21, 2021 04:19PM

  Re: Subjective vs. Objective

moklerman90July 21, 2021 01:42PM

  Re: Subjective vs. Objective

dzrams90July 21, 2021 01:51PM

  Re: Subjective vs. Objective

moklerman71July 21, 2021 02:02PM

  agree

zn74July 21, 2021 03:18PM

  Re: no this is objective

AlbaNY_Ram59July 21, 2021 04:41PM

  Re: no this is objective

zn82July 21, 2021 08:25PM

  Re: no this is objective

dzrams115July 21, 2021 11:55AM

  Re: no this is objective

zn80July 21, 2021 10:00PM

  Re: Well this is a turn...!

dzrams77July 21, 2021 10:41PM

  c'mon

zn88July 21, 2021 11:52PM

  Re: Yes DZ but Success Rate doesn't tell this entire story

merlin83July 21, 2021 11:01AM

  Re: Yes DZ but Success Rate doesn't tell this entire story

dzrams84July 21, 2021 11:26AM

  I completely agree

zn105July 20, 2021 06:20PM

  Re: I completely agree

merlin74July 20, 2021 07:15PM

  Re: I completely agree

oldschoolramfan81July 21, 2021 08:16AM

  Re: I completely agree

Rams4377July 21, 2021 09:07AM

  Re: I completely agree

zn73July 21, 2021 11:42AM

  Now that's more like it....

RAMbler271July 20, 2021 10:54AM

  Henderson has 1 issue

socalmab138July 20, 2021 12:32PM

  Re: Henderson has 1 issue

zn66July 20, 2021 06:50PM

  Re: Henderson has 1 issue

socalmab95July 20, 2021 07:03PM

  Re: Now that's more like it....

zn87July 20, 2021 06:47PM

  Re: He has shown he can't do the job

moklerman87July 21, 2021 12:37PM

  Re: Size

Classicalwit285July 20, 2021 10:59AM

  you're been wrong about that before & you are wrong about that now

zn123July 21, 2021 12:25PM

  SIZE SCHMIZE!! Can they play football??

Ramgator83July 21, 2021 03:56AM

  vid: good analysis of Akers

zn68July 21, 2021 06:00PM