June 17, 2019 10:15AM
i agree its a collaborative process, but i just dont see this "complete consensus" model as very realistic or plausible model, 43. Yes I agree they try to, and yes I agree it can occur the majority of the time. But sometimes two or three well meaning and intelligent people will disagree (the ourlads scouts talk about this in building their board as well) and no amount of talking and discussing will change it. in such cases i assume a consensus grade is probably tagged to a person, but how much those in dispute buy into that assigned consensus grade is where I believe the problem lies. moreover, once you get into the latter half of the board, the grade differences are almost inconsequential. IMO, it just makes sense that somebody has to be ultimately responsible for making the choice.

further, even if you want to believe the complete consensus model is exactly what they say it is, you can still assign picks to those involved. for example, if fisher argued persuasively for GRob over Sneads objections during the consensus building process, and they ranked Grob "1 or #2 overall, isnt GROB still a fisher pick?



Quote
Rams43
Quote
PHDram
what happens when mcvay and snead simply disagree about a player as often happens in real life? lets say snead ranks player A #1 and mcvay ranks the same player #10. they compromise on #5. when the draft occurs, player A is on the board and snead is ready to pull the trigger, but mcvay really wants player B because mcvay still thinks Player B is better than Player A. Who makes the choice? IMO someone needs to have ultimate authority to pull the trigger because disagreements over players are inevitable. I dont mean it needs to be acrimonious. just good- natured disagreements.

I love good-natured disagreements, PHD.

Honestly, I don’t think your scenario is possible because the Snead/McVay/ asst Coach, and scout braintrust has already stacked the board. Unless a trade opportunity presents itself or the Rams have already earlier taken that position, their course is pre-determined and they follow their board. And even if they’ve already taken a player at that position earlier, they might pull the trigger, anyway. Evans and Edwards illustrate that from just this last draft.

But if all else fails, I suspect that Snead now makes the final call.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  As with Jared Goff, Rams HC Sean McVay and GM Les Snead in line for new contracts...

Rams43693June 14, 2019 07:12PM

  Re: As with Jared Goff, Rams HC Sean McVay and GM Les Snead in line for new contracts...

RDU255June 14, 2019 11:51PM

  Re: As with Jared Goff, Rams HC Sean McVay and GM Les Snead in line for new contracts...

AlbaNY_Ram248June 15, 2019 03:51AM

  Re: As with Jared Goff, Rams HC Sean McVay and GM Les Snead in line for new contracts...

Scottish Ram223June 15, 2019 10:33AM

  Re: As with Jared Goff, Rams HC Sean McVay and GM Les Snead in line for new contracts...

zn323June 15, 2019 10:49AM

  Re: As with Jared Goff, Rams HC Sean McVay and GM Les Snead in line for new contracts...

Rams43199June 16, 2019 06:55AM

  Re: As with Jared Goff, Rams HC Sean McVay and GM Les Snead in line for new contracts...

zn213June 16, 2019 08:34AM

  Re: As with Jared Goff, Rams HC Sean McVay and GM Les Snead in line for new contracts...

Rams43182June 16, 2019 08:55AM

  Re: As with Jared Goff, Rams HC Sean McVay and GM Les Snead in line for new contracts...

zn204June 16, 2019 09:23AM

  Re: As with Jared Goff, Rams HC Sean McVay and GM Les Snead in line for new contracts...

David Deacon219June 17, 2019 02:30AM

  Re: As with Jared Goff, Rams HC Sean McVay and GM Les Snead in line for new contracts...

zn320June 17, 2019 03:28AM

  it seems like snead runs the show

PHDram156June 17, 2019 05:38AM

  Re: it seems like snead runs the show

zn177June 17, 2019 05:49AM

  Re: it seems like snead runs the show

PHDram177June 17, 2019 06:02AM

  Re: As with Jared Goff, Rams HC Sean McVay and GM Les Snead in line for new contracts...

David Deacon230June 17, 2019 06:18AM

  How about this interpretation?

Rams43198June 17, 2019 07:58AM

  ill dispute it

PHDram212June 17, 2019 08:52AM

  Re: ill dispute it

Rams43188June 17, 2019 09:17AM

  Re: ill dispute it

zn181June 17, 2019 09:40AM

  disputes

PHDram250June 17, 2019 10:21AM

  Re: disputes

LMU93275June 18, 2019 03:00AM

  I concur

PHDram163June 18, 2019 03:29AM

  consensus

LMU93179June 18, 2019 02:57AM

  Re: consensus

zn174June 18, 2019 04:32AM

  Re: consensus

PHDram168June 18, 2019 05:23AM

  Re: ill dispute it

PHDram177June 17, 2019 10:15AM

  comes down to clear decision making process

LMU93274June 18, 2019 02:53AM

  I agree

zn210June 18, 2019 05:29AM

  Re: How about this interpretation?

zn276June 17, 2019 01:29PM

  Re: How about this interpretation?

Rams43244June 17, 2019 02:58PM

  Re: How about this interpretation?

David Deacon209June 17, 2019 03:54PM

  Re: How about this interpretation?

zn184June 17, 2019 06:26PM

  Since were reiterating stuff

PHDram175June 17, 2019 06:43PM

  Re: How about this interpretation?

David Deacon267June 18, 2019 02:35AM

  He has improved since McVay has been on board

PHDram165June 18, 2019 03:26AM

  Re: He has improved since McVay has been on board

RamsFanSince69191June 18, 2019 09:18AM

  Re: He has improved since McVay has been on board

PHDram166June 18, 2019 04:31PM

  Fisher did a lot of things right...

jemach170June 18, 2019 05:07AM

  Rams aren't planning to extend McVay for now

jemach240June 18, 2019 04:49AM

  Lmao....man this guy is nonstop

Rampage2K-298June 18, 2019 10:24AM

  Demoff never once says they aren't going to extend McVay

promomasterj159June 18, 2019 12:10PM