Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

But you are displacing facts with what ifs.....

January 27, 2019 06:42AM
When you say that the saints if they got the PI could have run the clock off, you are assuming they would do so, however in the what if world you are going into they also could have fumbled in the next few plays and not had the chance to kick the FG....

What ewe83 is going by is what happened in those sequences that DID occur...what you say can only become a fact if they did indeed get the PI and indeed did take time off the clock....so your scenario actually deals from again as you say 1 side...that they get the call, run time off and kick the FG...you don't go into another chance where they would get the PI and fumble the ball away without a try at the FG....you go into your scenario to show they could have won IF the PI was called.....

Just because they should have gotten the PI call did not assure the saints of anything...not winning or losing that game. The only thing that can be assured are the things that actually happen...so going with if the PI was called still doesn't do it for the saints for good or bad.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/27/2019 06:43AM by roman18.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  A THINKING MAN!!!

Classicalwit977January 26, 2019 12:13PM

  Dungy nails it with this comment here

Rampage2K-554January 26, 2019 12:24PM

  He also said . . .

stlramz337January 26, 2019 12:30PM

  Re: Here's a little Irony......

oldschoolramfan378January 26, 2019 12:34PM

  Re: Dungy nails it with this comment here

Anonymous User266January 26, 2019 06:03PM

  Re: Dungy nails it with this comment here

Classicalwit219January 26, 2019 06:07PM

  Re: Dungy nails it with this comment here

Classicalwit191January 27, 2019 05:25AM

  Re: A THINKING MAN!!!

zn365January 26, 2019 12:34PM

  I agree with that, zn

NewMexicoRam221January 26, 2019 01:00PM

  Re: A THINKING MAN!!!

Classicalwit238January 26, 2019 01:12PM

  Re: A THINKING MAN!!!

zn220January 26, 2019 01:15PM

  Re: Sorry but I disagree

embraceable_ewe83320January 26, 2019 01:14PM

  Re: Sorry but I disagree

zn244January 26, 2019 01:25PM

  Re: Sorry but I disagree

bigjimram21213January 26, 2019 03:42PM

  Re: Sorry but I disagree

zn283January 26, 2019 04:00PM

  Re: Sorry but I disagree

Classicalwit201January 26, 2019 05:48PM

  Re: Sorry but I disagree

zn180January 27, 2019 02:50AM

  Re: This right here....

dzrams131January 27, 2019 01:28PM

  Re: This right here....

zn137January 27, 2019 01:39PM

  Re: This right here....

Classicalwit149January 27, 2019 02:15PM

  Re: This right here....

dzrams123January 27, 2019 02:57PM

  Re: This right here....

zn137January 27, 2019 03:09PM

  Re: Sorry but I disagree

bigjimram21165January 27, 2019 05:11AM

  Re: Sorry but I disagree

embraceable_ewe83252January 27, 2019 05:47AM

  Re: Sorry but I disagree

zn285January 27, 2019 05:53AM

  But you are displacing facts with what ifs.....

roman18185January 27, 2019 06:42AM

  Re: But you are displacing facts with what ifs.....

zn208January 27, 2019 07:24AM

  You are being selective in saying come on man......

roman18133January 27, 2019 07:39AM

  I'm not being anything..

zn151January 27, 2019 07:53AM

  I can see what zn is saying and agree...but..

SunTzu_vs_Camus383January 27, 2019 07:26AM

  Re: I can see what zn is saying and agree...but..

zn153January 27, 2019 08:01AM

  I completely agree with that assessment of fans...

SunTzu_vs_Camus138January 27, 2019 09:20AM

  Re: Sorry but I disagree

Rampage2K-141January 27, 2019 03:22PM