Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Sorry but I disagree

January 26, 2019 04:00PM
Quote
bigjimram21
zn, With the replays showing Saints committing what are multiple penalties on the PI missed call play, is it that everyone wants to judge those as incidental,

or not worthy enough for a flag,even though they are clearly penalties ( the hold on Brockers for instance, it was a hold by definition unless it's a let them play,

no big deal type of thing, but still a flag). What say you? Hearing people justify not flagging the JG facemask because it was in their mind "incidental" which doesn't exist in the

rule book so not all penalties are created equal( though considering that all penalties offset seems to suggest they are).

No no one I;ve heard, read, or talked to takes the non-calls against the Rams as incidental or as not worthy of flags. What they do is they take bringing them up as excuses Rams fans come up with to evade owning up to the significance of a non-call THAT blatant occurring at THAT point in the game. (They also say that if we look we would see other non-calls by Rams against the Saints too.)

It's just kind of basic psychology. Everyone SAW and automatically reacted emotionally to the R-C non-call PI. It stands out. It just means a lot to people. It would take a lot to overcome that.

And let me stress something---I just happen to firmly believe that if the situation were reversed and the exact same thing happened to the Rams, most Rams fans would take that view too. It's just part of being a fan.

Anyway. What people can't escape--whether on our side or on the other side--is that the R-C non-call was so open, clear, and obvious and happened at such a crucial point in the game, that it stands out. In fact I promise you this will be with us for a while. Every football fan will know what is meant by "the non-call" just as we don't have to explain the immaculate reception to the general football fan. It does absolutely no good for Steelers fans to tell Raiders fans "well you lucked out with the refs in that game at times too." That changes nothing.

It really is ENTIRELY a matter of opinion whether you say that a flagrant PI non-call at that point in the game is a big deal, or if you say no I think there were plenty of non-calls why should that one be a big deal.

There is no "truth" here that can win a contest of facts.

Rams fans will have one view, Saints fans another, and it all boils down to opinion or belief. No one is going to "truth" the other down.

Which of course is just an opinion. cool smiley









...
....



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 01/26/2019 04:57PM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  A THINKING MAN!!!

Classicalwit977January 26, 2019 12:13PM

  Dungy nails it with this comment here

Rampage2K-553January 26, 2019 12:24PM

  He also said . . .

stlramz336January 26, 2019 12:30PM

  Re: Here's a little Irony......

oldschoolramfan377January 26, 2019 12:34PM

  Re: Dungy nails it with this comment here

Anonymous User265January 26, 2019 06:03PM

  Re: Dungy nails it with this comment here

Classicalwit219January 26, 2019 06:07PM

  Re: Dungy nails it with this comment here

Classicalwit191January 27, 2019 05:25AM

  Re: A THINKING MAN!!!

zn365January 26, 2019 12:34PM

  I agree with that, zn

NewMexicoRam221January 26, 2019 01:00PM

  Re: A THINKING MAN!!!

Classicalwit238January 26, 2019 01:12PM

  Re: A THINKING MAN!!!

zn220January 26, 2019 01:15PM

  Re: Sorry but I disagree

embraceable_ewe83320January 26, 2019 01:14PM

  Re: Sorry but I disagree

zn244January 26, 2019 01:25PM

  Re: Sorry but I disagree

bigjimram21213January 26, 2019 03:42PM

  Re: Sorry but I disagree

zn282January 26, 2019 04:00PM

  Re: Sorry but I disagree

Classicalwit201January 26, 2019 05:48PM

  Re: Sorry but I disagree

zn179January 27, 2019 02:50AM

  Re: This right here....

dzrams131January 27, 2019 01:28PM

  Re: This right here....

zn136January 27, 2019 01:39PM

  Re: This right here....

Classicalwit149January 27, 2019 02:15PM

  Re: This right here....

dzrams123January 27, 2019 02:57PM

  Re: This right here....

zn137January 27, 2019 03:09PM

  Re: Sorry but I disagree

bigjimram21165January 27, 2019 05:11AM

  Re: Sorry but I disagree

embraceable_ewe83251January 27, 2019 05:47AM

  Re: Sorry but I disagree

zn285January 27, 2019 05:53AM

  But you are displacing facts with what ifs.....

roman18185January 27, 2019 06:42AM

  Re: But you are displacing facts with what ifs.....

zn207January 27, 2019 07:24AM

  You are being selective in saying come on man......

roman18132January 27, 2019 07:39AM

  I'm not being anything..

zn151January 27, 2019 07:53AM

  I can see what zn is saying and agree...but..

SunTzu_vs_Camus383January 27, 2019 07:26AM

  Re: I can see what zn is saying and agree...but..

zn152January 27, 2019 08:01AM

  I completely agree with that assessment of fans...

SunTzu_vs_Camus138January 27, 2019 09:20AM

  Re: Sorry but I disagree

Rampage2K-141January 27, 2019 03:22PM