July 09, 2017 12:39PM
Quote
zn
Quote
Classicalwit


I would accept those production parameters for elite WR status, zn, but I would also include touchdowns with 9 being the minimum.

Every time I discuss this (going back to 2007 btw) people mention TDs. They (and you) are probably right, though I don't know about 9. There are only 8 WRs in the entire league who got 9 or more. I would actually go with 4-5 at a minimum. That might chop the list down to around 18-20 guys.

BTW, just one vocabulary thing. I can't can't call this "elite status" because part of the whole point is to distinguish high-end talent, elite WRs from regular #1 WRs who just get the job done and produce without elite level skills. So as I say a lot, most elite WRs are #1s, but not every #1 is elite.

....

I didn't make it clear that I meant an elite level of production. I would consider 70/1000 with 9 TDs elite level production. I think Keenan Allen, when he's healthy, produces at an elite level though he's not physically elite. The year the Rams had Brandon Lloyd, he seemed like he could have produced at an elite level with a full season.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

zn1220July 05, 2017 05:17PM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

AlbaNY_Ram465July 05, 2017 10:40PM

  I don't see it that way

RFIP575July 06, 2017 03:06AM

  Well, maybe you should look again!

AlbaNY_Ram572July 06, 2017 03:29AM

  Well, mark me in the "no one" column re: Britt

ArizonaRamFan493July 06, 2017 06:28AM

  Re: Well, mark me in the "no one" column re: Britt

laram397July 06, 2017 06:51AM

  Re: Well, mark me in the "no one" column re: Britt

zn376July 06, 2017 07:36AM

  One thiing is for danged sure...

Rams43369July 06, 2017 07:52AM

  Re: It was a no-brainier...

laram367July 06, 2017 08:20AM

  Okay, all that is definitely fair .nm

ArizonaRamFan352July 06, 2017 08:55AM

  Re: It was a no-brainier...

21Dog353July 06, 2017 11:14AM

  i dont know about cancer

PHDram345July 06, 2017 12:21PM

  hands...determination...

wv ram340July 06, 2017 01:08PM

  Re: hands...determination...

zn342July 06, 2017 01:12PM

  They were gone before McVay was hired...

PaulButcher59500July 06, 2017 11:39AM

  Re: IF the HC wanted them they would still be here...NM

laram348July 06, 2017 12:20PM

  Don`t be so sure about that....(NM)

PaulButcher59330July 06, 2017 12:25PM

  Re: That's very interesting...

laram366July 06, 2017 01:01PM

  Clearly you still underestimate Demoff...

PaulButcher59437July 06, 2017 01:09PM

  Re:I wouldn't use that word...

laram351July 06, 2017 01:21PM

  Not by job title of course ;)

PaulButcher59371July 06, 2017 01:25PM

  Gotta disagree here PB

Old Goat341July 06, 2017 02:18PM

  That "new culture" is a collaborative effort IMO...

PaulButcher59399July 06, 2017 02:22PM

  Agree

Old Goat629July 06, 2017 02:27PM

  ANS (not long) = Depends on Goff/Mcvay. Nm

guinnessram271July 09, 2017 11:36AM

  I have to give you credit when you "adopt" a player you stick with them forever

LesBaker393July 09, 2017 12:14PM

  Re: I have to give you credit when you "adopt" a player you stick with them forever

Rams43333July 09, 2017 12:31PM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

LMU93371July 06, 2017 03:34AM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

RFIP429July 06, 2017 03:51AM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

Steve416July 06, 2017 06:15AM

  I kinda like the way ZN posed this...

Rams43429July 06, 2017 06:49AM

  my oversimplified view of Woods potential

LMU93376July 06, 2017 07:06AM

  No...

PaulButcher59417July 06, 2017 01:04PM

  Re: No...

zn467July 06, 2017 01:10PM

  Re: No...

PaulButcher59340July 06, 2017 01:20PM

  Re: He put up 600 yards with YOU at qb....

laram466July 06, 2017 01:25PM

  He`s never come close to 1K yet in 4 full seasons...

PaulButcher59367July 06, 2017 01:38PM

  Re: Right because we know qb'ing doesn't matter..*eye roll*...NM.

laram699July 06, 2017 01:47PM

  So will he or will he not be a 1,000 yard receiver with the Rams in `17?

PaulButcher59351July 06, 2017 01:53PM

  Re: So will he or will he not be a 1,000 yard receiver with the Rams in `17?

laram491July 07, 2017 03:54AM

  I can see him as our new Amendola...nm

RFIP317July 07, 2017 04:49AM

  Re: No...

zn383July 07, 2017 07:10PM

  Re: No...

TonyHunter87335July 10, 2017 09:20AM

  Re: Be prepared to stand up and take your medicine...NM

laram491July 10, 2017 01:55PM

  And you as well

TonyHunter87312July 10, 2017 05:01PM

  Doesn't that assume

reggae350July 06, 2017 01:18PM

  Re: Doesn't that assume

zn314July 07, 2017 07:20PM

  Woods has not performed well but

Rams_81369July 07, 2017 02:46AM

  Re: Woods has not performed well but

RFIP347July 07, 2017 03:17AM

  Re: Woods has not performed well but

zn328July 08, 2017 08:09AM

  The gap between Woods and Watkins is signficant

Rams_81327July 09, 2017 06:16AM

  Is the QB situation here any better?

TonyHunter87327July 07, 2017 04:40AM

  good post, zn

SunTzu_vs_Camus359July 07, 2017 06:44AM

  Hahahaha. Nm

TonyHunter87286July 10, 2017 09:22AM

  Goff is a bigger question mark than Woods is, for sure...

Rams43360July 07, 2017 07:33AM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

Classicalwit324July 08, 2017 03:58PM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

zn308July 08, 2017 04:15PM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

Classicalwit524July 09, 2017 12:39PM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

zn330July 09, 2017 03:56PM

  Why didn't we just keep Britt?

rambleon311July 10, 2017 08:51AM

  Re: Why didn't we just keep Britt?

zn332July 10, 2017 09:00AM

  Britt is the better receiver...

TonyHunter87420July 10, 2017 09:33AM

  Re: Britt is the better receiver...

Rams43312July 10, 2017 01:23PM

  Re: Britt is the better receiver...

zn326July 10, 2017 08:14PM

  70/1000 makes a #1? Not a chance

Flipper336677July 11, 2017 10:12AM