Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

I don't see it that way

July 06, 2017 03:06AM
Woods played opposite Watkins in Buffalo, he won have that luxury here were most other targets will be newbe's. Watkins in parts of just 8 games put up more yards that Woods did all year.

I like a Woods and thing he could be a good piece but a #1? Nah, not in my book anyways.

Btw, didn't Britt put up 1k last year? And no one even wanted him back.


Quote
AlbaNY_Ram
I think your definition of a #1 receiver passes the smell test: only 22 players reached both thresholds last year (19 WRs and 3 TEs).

And Woods could certainly reach them this year. Woods got his numbers last year (51 rec, 613 yards) on a team that only passed the ball 474 times for 3,036 yards. Washington OTOH passed the ball 607 times for 4,758 yards.

If Buffalo passed as much as Washington did and Woods maintained the same pace his numbers would have been 65 catches for 960 yards. And if Woods is the primary WR and McVay has any level of success running his offense in LA then it's easy to see that Woods could reach #1 status with the Rams.



R.I.P. Nelson aka TonyHunter87 1971 - 2017 far too soon..

Your last words to me: "Your a great guy RFIP. I was very sad when you left the board, and your son, but was glad to see you back. Take care my friend, may God be by your side." 09/09/2017 12:58AM

No Nelson, you were a far better man than I, and I am sure an awesome husband and father as well. I will miss you my friend. -RFIP
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

zn1216July 05, 2017 05:17PM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

AlbaNY_Ram463July 05, 2017 10:40PM

  I don't see it that way

RFIP573July 06, 2017 03:06AM

  Well, maybe you should look again!

AlbaNY_Ram564July 06, 2017 03:29AM

  Well, mark me in the "no one" column re: Britt

ArizonaRamFan492July 06, 2017 06:28AM

  Re: Well, mark me in the "no one" column re: Britt

laram393July 06, 2017 06:51AM

  Re: Well, mark me in the "no one" column re: Britt

zn374July 06, 2017 07:36AM

  One thiing is for danged sure...

Rams43367July 06, 2017 07:52AM

  Re: It was a no-brainier...

laram362July 06, 2017 08:20AM

  Okay, all that is definitely fair .nm

ArizonaRamFan349July 06, 2017 08:55AM

  Re: It was a no-brainier...

21Dog352July 06, 2017 11:14AM

  i dont know about cancer

PHDram344July 06, 2017 12:21PM

  hands...determination...

wv ram338July 06, 2017 01:08PM

  Re: hands...determination...

zn340July 06, 2017 01:12PM

  They were gone before McVay was hired...

PaulButcher59498July 06, 2017 11:39AM

  Re: IF the HC wanted them they would still be here...NM

laram346July 06, 2017 12:20PM

  Don`t be so sure about that....(NM)

PaulButcher59329July 06, 2017 12:25PM

  Re: That's very interesting...

laram365July 06, 2017 01:01PM

  Clearly you still underestimate Demoff...

PaulButcher59435July 06, 2017 01:09PM

  Re:I wouldn't use that word...

laram347July 06, 2017 01:21PM

  Not by job title of course ;)

PaulButcher59368July 06, 2017 01:25PM

  Gotta disagree here PB

Old Goat338July 06, 2017 02:18PM

  That "new culture" is a collaborative effort IMO...

PaulButcher59396July 06, 2017 02:22PM

  Agree

Old Goat623July 06, 2017 02:27PM

  ANS (not long) = Depends on Goff/Mcvay. Nm

guinnessram269July 09, 2017 11:36AM

  I have to give you credit when you "adopt" a player you stick with them forever

LesBaker391July 09, 2017 12:14PM

  Re: I have to give you credit when you "adopt" a player you stick with them forever

Rams43331July 09, 2017 12:31PM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

LMU93369July 06, 2017 03:34AM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

RFIP426July 06, 2017 03:51AM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

Steve414July 06, 2017 06:15AM

  I kinda like the way ZN posed this...

Rams43428July 06, 2017 06:49AM

  my oversimplified view of Woods potential

LMU93375July 06, 2017 07:06AM

  No...

PaulButcher59416July 06, 2017 01:04PM

  Re: No...

zn465July 06, 2017 01:10PM

  Re: No...

PaulButcher59339July 06, 2017 01:20PM

  Re: He put up 600 yards with YOU at qb....

laram465July 06, 2017 01:25PM

  He`s never come close to 1K yet in 4 full seasons...

PaulButcher59365July 06, 2017 01:38PM

  Re: Right because we know qb'ing doesn't matter..*eye roll*...NM.

laram696July 06, 2017 01:47PM

  So will he or will he not be a 1,000 yard receiver with the Rams in `17?

PaulButcher59349July 06, 2017 01:53PM

  Re: So will he or will he not be a 1,000 yard receiver with the Rams in `17?

laram491July 07, 2017 03:54AM

  I can see him as our new Amendola...nm

RFIP316July 07, 2017 04:49AM

  Re: No...

zn381July 07, 2017 07:10PM

  Re: No...

TonyHunter87334July 10, 2017 09:20AM

  Re: Be prepared to stand up and take your medicine...NM

laram487July 10, 2017 01:55PM

  And you as well

TonyHunter87310July 10, 2017 05:01PM

  Doesn't that assume

reggae349July 06, 2017 01:18PM

  Re: Doesn't that assume

zn313July 07, 2017 07:20PM

  Woods has not performed well but

Rams_81368July 07, 2017 02:46AM

  Re: Woods has not performed well but

RFIP346July 07, 2017 03:17AM

  Re: Woods has not performed well but

zn326July 08, 2017 08:09AM

  The gap between Woods and Watkins is signficant

Rams_81325July 09, 2017 06:16AM

  Is the QB situation here any better?

TonyHunter87326July 07, 2017 04:40AM

  good post, zn

SunTzu_vs_Camus357July 07, 2017 06:44AM

  Hahahaha. Nm

TonyHunter87285July 10, 2017 09:22AM

  Goff is a bigger question mark than Woods is, for sure...

Rams43358July 07, 2017 07:33AM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

Classicalwit323July 08, 2017 03:58PM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

zn307July 08, 2017 04:15PM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

Classicalwit523July 09, 2017 12:39PM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

zn328July 09, 2017 03:56PM

  Why didn't we just keep Britt?

rambleon308July 10, 2017 08:51AM

  Re: Why didn't we just keep Britt?

zn330July 10, 2017 09:00AM

  Britt is the better receiver...

TonyHunter87417July 10, 2017 09:33AM

  Re: Britt is the better receiver...

Rams43308July 10, 2017 01:23PM

  Re: Britt is the better receiver...

zn324July 10, 2017 08:14PM

  70/1000 makes a #1? Not a chance

Flipper336674July 11, 2017 10:12AM