July 06, 2017 01:20PM
Quote
zn
Quote
PaulButcher59
he`s capable of matching his career best numbers in 2014 (69 rec, 699 yds, 5 TD`s) with Buffalo, I don't see anything beyond that. If that's by definition a #1 WR to some of you, than that's what he will be to you.

Well fwiw the numbers you list there don't meet my definition of a #1. If that's all he does I won't be saying yes he came through and produced like (my definition of a) #1.

Though I should say that my definition does allow me to say a possession receiver has reached #1 status...IF he produces in line with the basic standard (70/1000).

I would be VERY surprised if he goes over 1K. If he does, I`ll eat crow for sure..



“The moment we want to believe something, we suddenly see all the arguments for it, and become blind to the arguments against it.”

George Bernard Shaw
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

zn1216July 05, 2017 05:17PM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

AlbaNY_Ram462July 05, 2017 10:40PM

  I don't see it that way

RFIP573July 06, 2017 03:06AM

  Well, maybe you should look again!

AlbaNY_Ram564July 06, 2017 03:29AM

  Well, mark me in the "no one" column re: Britt

ArizonaRamFan491July 06, 2017 06:28AM

  Re: Well, mark me in the "no one" column re: Britt

laram393July 06, 2017 06:51AM

  Re: Well, mark me in the "no one" column re: Britt

zn374July 06, 2017 07:36AM

  One thiing is for danged sure...

Rams43367July 06, 2017 07:52AM

  Re: It was a no-brainier...

laram362July 06, 2017 08:20AM

  Okay, all that is definitely fair .nm

ArizonaRamFan348July 06, 2017 08:55AM

  Re: It was a no-brainier...

21Dog352July 06, 2017 11:14AM

  i dont know about cancer

PHDram344July 06, 2017 12:21PM

  hands...determination...

wv ram337July 06, 2017 01:08PM

  Re: hands...determination...

zn339July 06, 2017 01:12PM

  They were gone before McVay was hired...

PaulButcher59497July 06, 2017 11:39AM

  Re: IF the HC wanted them they would still be here...NM

laram345July 06, 2017 12:20PM

  Don`t be so sure about that....(NM)

PaulButcher59329July 06, 2017 12:25PM

  Re: That's very interesting...

laram365July 06, 2017 01:01PM

  Clearly you still underestimate Demoff...

PaulButcher59435July 06, 2017 01:09PM

  Re:I wouldn't use that word...

laram347July 06, 2017 01:21PM

  Not by job title of course ;)

PaulButcher59368July 06, 2017 01:25PM

  Gotta disagree here PB

Old Goat338July 06, 2017 02:18PM

  That "new culture" is a collaborative effort IMO...

PaulButcher59396July 06, 2017 02:22PM

  Agree

Old Goat622July 06, 2017 02:27PM

  ANS (not long) = Depends on Goff/Mcvay. Nm

guinnessram269July 09, 2017 11:36AM

  I have to give you credit when you "adopt" a player you stick with them forever

LesBaker391July 09, 2017 12:14PM

  Re: I have to give you credit when you "adopt" a player you stick with them forever

Rams43331July 09, 2017 12:31PM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

LMU93369July 06, 2017 03:34AM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

RFIP425July 06, 2017 03:51AM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

Steve414July 06, 2017 06:15AM

  I kinda like the way ZN posed this...

Rams43427July 06, 2017 06:49AM

  my oversimplified view of Woods potential

LMU93374July 06, 2017 07:06AM

  No...

PaulButcher59416July 06, 2017 01:04PM

  Re: No...

zn465July 06, 2017 01:10PM

  Re: No...

PaulButcher59338July 06, 2017 01:20PM

  Re: He put up 600 yards with YOU at qb....

laram465July 06, 2017 01:25PM

  He`s never come close to 1K yet in 4 full seasons...

PaulButcher59364July 06, 2017 01:38PM

  Re: Right because we know qb'ing doesn't matter..*eye roll*...NM.

laram696July 06, 2017 01:47PM

  So will he or will he not be a 1,000 yard receiver with the Rams in `17?

PaulButcher59348July 06, 2017 01:53PM

  Re: So will he or will he not be a 1,000 yard receiver with the Rams in `17?

laram491July 07, 2017 03:54AM

  I can see him as our new Amendola...nm

RFIP315July 07, 2017 04:49AM

  Re: No...

zn381July 07, 2017 07:10PM

  Re: No...

TonyHunter87334July 10, 2017 09:20AM

  Re: Be prepared to stand up and take your medicine...NM

laram487July 10, 2017 01:55PM

  And you as well

TonyHunter87310July 10, 2017 05:01PM

  Doesn't that assume

reggae348July 06, 2017 01:18PM

  Re: Doesn't that assume

zn312July 07, 2017 07:20PM

  Woods has not performed well but

Rams_81367July 07, 2017 02:46AM

  Re: Woods has not performed well but

RFIP346July 07, 2017 03:17AM

  Re: Woods has not performed well but

zn325July 08, 2017 08:09AM

  The gap between Woods and Watkins is signficant

Rams_81325July 09, 2017 06:16AM

  Is the QB situation here any better?

TonyHunter87325July 07, 2017 04:40AM

  good post, zn

SunTzu_vs_Camus356July 07, 2017 06:44AM

  Hahahaha. Nm

TonyHunter87285July 10, 2017 09:22AM

  Goff is a bigger question mark than Woods is, for sure...

Rams43358July 07, 2017 07:33AM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

Classicalwit323July 08, 2017 03:58PM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

zn307July 08, 2017 04:15PM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

Classicalwit523July 09, 2017 12:39PM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

zn328July 09, 2017 03:56PM

  Why didn't we just keep Britt?

rambleon307July 10, 2017 08:51AM

  Re: Why didn't we just keep Britt?

zn330July 10, 2017 09:00AM

  Britt is the better receiver...

TonyHunter87416July 10, 2017 09:33AM

  Re: Britt is the better receiver...

Rams43308July 10, 2017 01:23PM

  Re: Britt is the better receiver...

zn324July 10, 2017 08:14PM

  70/1000 makes a #1? Not a chance

Flipper336674July 11, 2017 10:12AM