July 06, 2017 07:36AM
Quote
laram
Quote
ArizonaRamFan
Minor quibble, despite agreeing with your main point, RFIP. I was one of the few Britt supporters, and I recognize he was a problem in some ways perhaps in the locker room, but he was perhaps the ONLY Rams player last year on O who:

*Didn't quit trying at least sometimes
*Played with pride and seemed truly frustrated by losing
*Consistently did his job, even if it was just throwing a (rare) downfield block

I'll admit that 1000 yards was probably an overachievement, but the fact that he put up numbers despite missing 3 (or was it 4?) games in such a QB+scheme disaster is really to his credit. I'm not broken up that he was released since it's new regime time, but Britt's consistency was one of the very few bright spots on an otherwise putrid Rams offense. I didn't like his attitude all the time, but I admit that he was one of the rare ones, who really did come to the Rams and play at or above his contract status.

I might be misremembering this, but I think he's the first Rams WR with 1000+ yards since Torry Holt.

Quote
RFIP
Btw, didn't Britt put up 1k last year? And no one even wanted him back.


Hollow numbers ARF, Britt is/was a BUM.

1,000 yards doesn't mean what it use to especially in a pass happy league, playing from behind and you only put up 5 TD"S!

Btw, Britt played in 15 games last season!

I hate to disagree with ARF on this at least partly because I would have liked all that to be true about Britt.

But he actually dogged it on some plays, to the point where it became the stuff of commentary during broadcasts.

I think he started out better early in the season, but then he started getting to be more of a problem. Earlier that was at least in part because he and Keenum spent time building chemistry and playing throw and catch in the off-season.

There's also of course the reports of WRs not being available for extra work with Goff. As the senior WR Britt should have at least led by example with that, if not pushing the others into it.

I think Woods is everything Britt isn't in terms of being a dedicated pro. He's a very different kind of receiver though, and if Woods gets his yards he will be doing it in very different ways than Britt did.

...



Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 07/06/2017 07:58AM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

zn1222July 05, 2017 05:17PM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

AlbaNY_Ram466July 05, 2017 10:40PM

  I don't see it that way

RFIP576July 06, 2017 03:06AM

  Well, maybe you should look again!

AlbaNY_Ram572July 06, 2017 03:29AM

  Well, mark me in the "no one" column re: Britt

ArizonaRamFan494July 06, 2017 06:28AM

  Re: Well, mark me in the "no one" column re: Britt

laram397July 06, 2017 06:51AM

  Re: Well, mark me in the "no one" column re: Britt

zn376July 06, 2017 07:36AM

  One thiing is for danged sure...

Rams43370July 06, 2017 07:52AM

  Re: It was a no-brainier...

laram367July 06, 2017 08:20AM

  Okay, all that is definitely fair .nm

ArizonaRamFan353July 06, 2017 08:55AM

  Re: It was a no-brainier...

21Dog354July 06, 2017 11:14AM

  i dont know about cancer

PHDram347July 06, 2017 12:21PM

  hands...determination...

wv ram341July 06, 2017 01:08PM

  Re: hands...determination...

zn343July 06, 2017 01:12PM

  They were gone before McVay was hired...

PaulButcher59500July 06, 2017 11:39AM

  Re: IF the HC wanted them they would still be here...NM

laram348July 06, 2017 12:20PM

  Don`t be so sure about that....(NM)

PaulButcher59330July 06, 2017 12:25PM

  Re: That's very interesting...

laram367July 06, 2017 01:01PM

  Clearly you still underestimate Demoff...

PaulButcher59437July 06, 2017 01:09PM

  Re:I wouldn't use that word...

laram351July 06, 2017 01:21PM

  Not by job title of course ;)

PaulButcher59371July 06, 2017 01:25PM

  Gotta disagree here PB

Old Goat341July 06, 2017 02:18PM

  That "new culture" is a collaborative effort IMO...

PaulButcher59399July 06, 2017 02:22PM

  Agree

Old Goat630July 06, 2017 02:27PM

  ANS (not long) = Depends on Goff/Mcvay. Nm

guinnessram272July 09, 2017 11:36AM

  I have to give you credit when you "adopt" a player you stick with them forever

LesBaker394July 09, 2017 12:14PM

  Re: I have to give you credit when you "adopt" a player you stick with them forever

Rams43334July 09, 2017 12:31PM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

LMU93371July 06, 2017 03:34AM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

RFIP429July 06, 2017 03:51AM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

Steve417July 06, 2017 06:15AM

  I kinda like the way ZN posed this...

Rams43430July 06, 2017 06:49AM

  my oversimplified view of Woods potential

LMU93377July 06, 2017 07:06AM

  No...

PaulButcher59417July 06, 2017 01:04PM

  Re: No...

zn467July 06, 2017 01:10PM

  Re: No...

PaulButcher59340July 06, 2017 01:20PM

  Re: He put up 600 yards with YOU at qb....

laram467July 06, 2017 01:25PM

  He`s never come close to 1K yet in 4 full seasons...

PaulButcher59367July 06, 2017 01:38PM

  Re: Right because we know qb'ing doesn't matter..*eye roll*...NM.

laram699July 06, 2017 01:47PM

  So will he or will he not be a 1,000 yard receiver with the Rams in `17?

PaulButcher59351July 06, 2017 01:53PM

  Re: So will he or will he not be a 1,000 yard receiver with the Rams in `17?

laram491July 07, 2017 03:54AM

  I can see him as our new Amendola...nm

RFIP318July 07, 2017 04:49AM

  Re: No...

zn383July 07, 2017 07:10PM

  Re: No...

TonyHunter87336July 10, 2017 09:20AM

  Re: Be prepared to stand up and take your medicine...NM

laram491July 10, 2017 01:55PM

  And you as well

TonyHunter87312July 10, 2017 05:01PM

  Doesn't that assume

reggae352July 06, 2017 01:18PM

  Re: Doesn't that assume

zn314July 07, 2017 07:20PM

  Woods has not performed well but

Rams_81370July 07, 2017 02:46AM

  Re: Woods has not performed well but

RFIP347July 07, 2017 03:17AM

  Re: Woods has not performed well but

zn328July 08, 2017 08:09AM

  The gap between Woods and Watkins is signficant

Rams_81327July 09, 2017 06:16AM

  Is the QB situation here any better?

TonyHunter87328July 07, 2017 04:40AM

  good post, zn

SunTzu_vs_Camus360July 07, 2017 06:44AM

  Hahahaha. Nm

TonyHunter87287July 10, 2017 09:22AM

  Goff is a bigger question mark than Woods is, for sure...

Rams43360July 07, 2017 07:33AM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

Classicalwit325July 08, 2017 03:58PM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

zn308July 08, 2017 04:15PM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

Classicalwit525July 09, 2017 12:39PM

  Re: Can Woods be a #1? Depends on what you mean by that (long)

zn331July 09, 2017 03:56PM

  Why didn't we just keep Britt?

rambleon312July 10, 2017 08:51AM

  Re: Why didn't we just keep Britt?

zn332July 10, 2017 09:00AM

  Britt is the better receiver...

TonyHunter87421July 10, 2017 09:33AM

  Re: Britt is the better receiver...

Rams43312July 10, 2017 01:23PM

  Re: Britt is the better receiver...

zn326July 10, 2017 08:14PM

  70/1000 makes a #1? Not a chance

Flipper336678July 11, 2017 10:12AM