March 29, 2017 09:03AM
Quote
zn
Quote
LMU93
His 2015 was his best. For sure. In fact he was probably a better runner than receiver. At least one of his receiving TDs was really a run (short shuffle pass/handoff from Foles vs. Green Bay).

But the sum of his work in 4 years just doesn't impress. Yards from scrimmage? 79th since he came into the league. Punt return average? Bottom quarter. His catch % (among anyone with 150+ catches)- bottom third (which is pretty amazing for a guy that has so many screens thrown at him).

Other than 3 highlight reel punt returns he has just not been an above average player. He can and should benefit from better and more creative coaching on offense. I really think he will.

To me it's how he';s used.

2015 takes best advantage of what he actually IS.

I don't put 2016 on Tavon, that's just not him being used effectively. 2016 was from the "Tavon's a receiver" playbook and as I keep saying, using him that way limits him.

.

Using Tavon "effectively" is very important, zn. We can all agree upon that. And it seems to be a McVay trademark.

But there is still the matter of his height of 5' 8", his hands, his route running, his catch radius, his sight adjustments, etc. His coaches can only do so much by "how he's used".

Maybe Tavon can win me over in '17, but for right now I'm seeing a huge contract extension blunder on Fisher's part. Thank Gawd Demoff structured it in such a way that we can escape cap hell with it after only 2 years.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/29/2017 09:04AM by Rams43.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  What I would do with Tavon Austin...

PSJRam1007March 28, 2017 05:48PM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

zn386March 28, 2017 07:48PM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

PSJRam304March 29, 2017 04:55AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

Rams43328March 29, 2017 05:40AM

  sobering stats on Austin...

LMU93317March 29, 2017 05:57AM

  that applies IF you define him purely as a receiver

zn227March 29, 2017 06:04AM

  Re: that applies IF you define him purely as a receiver

Rams43206March 29, 2017 06:51AM

  Re: that applies IF you define him purely as a receiver

zn294March 29, 2017 07:52AM

  Re: that applies IF you define him purely as a receiver

Rams43201March 29, 2017 08:29AM

  Re: that applies IF you define him purely as a receiver

LMU93199March 29, 2017 08:10AM

  where we don't agree

zn217March 29, 2017 08:20AM

  Re: where we don't agree

LMU93283March 29, 2017 08:29AM

  Re: where we don't agree

zn267March 29, 2017 08:55AM

  Re: where we don't agree

Rams43287March 29, 2017 09:03AM

  Re: where we don't agree

zn207March 29, 2017 10:22AM

  Re: where we don't agree

Rams43193March 29, 2017 10:28AM

  Re: where we don't agree

zn209March 29, 2017 10:38AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

oldschoolramfan273March 29, 2017 05:59AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

zn208March 29, 2017 06:13AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

dzrams265March 29, 2017 07:33AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

zn204March 29, 2017 07:54AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

oldschoolramfan192March 29, 2017 09:06AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

zn261March 29, 2017 10:24AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

zn210March 29, 2017 06:00AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

RAMSINCE ARNETT215March 29, 2017 06:40AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

oldschoolramfan272March 29, 2017 09:08AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...dream on lol

RAMSINCE ARNETT256March 29, 2017 11:06AM

  what I'd do is......

ferragamo79300March 29, 2017 07:54AM

  Re: what I'd do is......That's right Ferragamo.....

oldschoolramfan277March 29, 2017 09:11AM

  Re: what I'd do is......That's right Ferragamo.....

ferragamo79250March 29, 2017 03:53PM

  Re: what I'd do is......

RAMSINCE ARNETT252March 29, 2017 10:45AM

  LMAO

ferragamo79227March 29, 2017 03:54PM

  Trade him

Ram49384March 29, 2017 02:17PM

  Re: Trade him

ferragamo79392March 29, 2017 06:33PM