Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

that applies IF you define him purely as a receiver

March 29, 2017 06:04AM
Quote
LMU93
Since the 1970 merger, 220 receivers have caught at least 150 passes in their first four seasons. Austin has 181- tied for 142nd. He's 217th out of those 220 in YPC (9.1) and 219th in receiving yards. His 12 TD receptions are tied for 173rd.

We can talk about his role, versatility, big play ability and all that. But while he's not a bust he has very much underperformed.

I don't define Austin purely as a receiver and never did. That's going back to before he was drafted---my take on him then, in discussions before the draft, was that (1) I wanted him, and (2) you can't define him purely as a receiver because that's not what he is.

He's a hybrid who gets you yards and TDs a variety of ways.

In 2015 when they used him right he had as many carries as catches.

And he is one of a handful who has 3 or more TDs on returns across the last 3 years.

His value does not lie in catches alone.

That's always been my take on him.

...
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  What I would do with Tavon Austin...

PSJRam1004March 28, 2017 05:48PM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

zn386March 28, 2017 07:48PM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

PSJRam303March 29, 2017 04:55AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

Rams43327March 29, 2017 05:40AM

  sobering stats on Austin...

LMU93316March 29, 2017 05:57AM

  that applies IF you define him purely as a receiver

zn226March 29, 2017 06:04AM

  Re: that applies IF you define him purely as a receiver

Rams43205March 29, 2017 06:51AM

  Re: that applies IF you define him purely as a receiver

zn293March 29, 2017 07:52AM

  Re: that applies IF you define him purely as a receiver

Rams43200March 29, 2017 08:29AM

  Re: that applies IF you define him purely as a receiver

LMU93198March 29, 2017 08:10AM

  where we don't agree

zn217March 29, 2017 08:20AM

  Re: where we don't agree

LMU93283March 29, 2017 08:29AM

  Re: where we don't agree

zn266March 29, 2017 08:55AM

  Re: where we don't agree

Rams43286March 29, 2017 09:03AM

  Re: where we don't agree

zn206March 29, 2017 10:22AM

  Re: where we don't agree

Rams43193March 29, 2017 10:28AM

  Re: where we don't agree

zn208March 29, 2017 10:38AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

oldschoolramfan273March 29, 2017 05:59AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

zn207March 29, 2017 06:13AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

dzrams265March 29, 2017 07:33AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

zn202March 29, 2017 07:54AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

oldschoolramfan190March 29, 2017 09:06AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

zn261March 29, 2017 10:24AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

zn209March 29, 2017 06:00AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

RAMSINCE ARNETT214March 29, 2017 06:40AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

oldschoolramfan271March 29, 2017 09:08AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...dream on lol

RAMSINCE ARNETT255March 29, 2017 11:06AM

  what I'd do is......

ferragamo79298March 29, 2017 07:54AM

  Re: what I'd do is......That's right Ferragamo.....

oldschoolramfan276March 29, 2017 09:11AM

  Re: what I'd do is......That's right Ferragamo.....

ferragamo79249March 29, 2017 03:53PM

  Re: what I'd do is......

RAMSINCE ARNETT252March 29, 2017 10:45AM

  LMAO

ferragamo79225March 29, 2017 03:54PM

  Trade him

Ram49383March 29, 2017 02:17PM

  Re: Trade him

ferragamo79391March 29, 2017 06:33PM