Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: that applies IF you define him purely as a receiver

March 29, 2017 07:52AM
Quote
Rams43
If we look at them objectively, Tavon's stats tell the story.

[www.espn.com]

He has his occasional flashes. Enough to tease us, anyway.

But he's not worth that $42 million salary that Fisher gave him and told him that he "earned" on Hard Knocks. That whopper was right up there with the "no 7-9 BS" one.

Ironic, isn't it? Tavon gets his big payday and his stats decline. Go figure.

Let us hope that one of the following occurs with Tavon this year:

McVay figures out how to better utilize him.
Tavon's football IQ takes a big jump.
Tavon finds a pair of NFL quality hands.
Tavon starts running crisp routes for Goff.
Tavon learns about making sight adjustments.

'Cause if Tavon's play doesn't take a significant jump this year, his contract structure will permit his trade or release next offseason. McVay strikes me as a HC that will either demand and receive top production from his players, or he will replace them with someone who will provide what he demands. Just ask Britt and Quick, among others. Just business.


IMO? In 2015 they used him well and it shows. In 2016 they didn't and it shows.

That;s what I have always seen in the stats, every time I look at them.


...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/29/2017 08:10AM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  What I would do with Tavon Austin...

PSJRam1004March 28, 2017 05:48PM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

zn386March 28, 2017 07:48PM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

PSJRam303March 29, 2017 04:55AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

Rams43327March 29, 2017 05:40AM

  sobering stats on Austin...

LMU93316March 29, 2017 05:57AM

  that applies IF you define him purely as a receiver

zn227March 29, 2017 06:04AM

  Re: that applies IF you define him purely as a receiver

Rams43205March 29, 2017 06:51AM

  Re: that applies IF you define him purely as a receiver

zn293March 29, 2017 07:52AM

  Re: that applies IF you define him purely as a receiver

Rams43200March 29, 2017 08:29AM

  Re: that applies IF you define him purely as a receiver

LMU93198March 29, 2017 08:10AM

  where we don't agree

zn217March 29, 2017 08:20AM

  Re: where we don't agree

LMU93283March 29, 2017 08:29AM

  Re: where we don't agree

zn266March 29, 2017 08:55AM

  Re: where we don't agree

Rams43286March 29, 2017 09:03AM

  Re: where we don't agree

zn206March 29, 2017 10:22AM

  Re: where we don't agree

Rams43193March 29, 2017 10:28AM

  Re: where we don't agree

zn208March 29, 2017 10:38AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

oldschoolramfan273March 29, 2017 05:59AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

zn207March 29, 2017 06:13AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

dzrams265March 29, 2017 07:33AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

zn202March 29, 2017 07:54AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

oldschoolramfan190March 29, 2017 09:06AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

zn261March 29, 2017 10:24AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

zn209March 29, 2017 06:00AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

RAMSINCE ARNETT214March 29, 2017 06:40AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...

oldschoolramfan271March 29, 2017 09:08AM

  Re: What I would do with Tavon Austin...dream on lol

RAMSINCE ARNETT255March 29, 2017 11:06AM

  what I'd do is......

ferragamo79298March 29, 2017 07:54AM

  Re: what I'd do is......That's right Ferragamo.....

oldschoolramfan276March 29, 2017 09:11AM

  Re: what I'd do is......That's right Ferragamo.....

ferragamo79249March 29, 2017 03:53PM

  Re: what I'd do is......

RAMSINCE ARNETT252March 29, 2017 10:45AM

  LMAO

ferragamo79225March 29, 2017 03:54PM

  Trade him

Ram49383March 29, 2017 02:17PM

  Re: Trade him

ferragamo79391March 29, 2017 06:33PM