January 04, 2019 06:11PM
Quote
Old Goat
How many years have we had these easily replaced RTs? I seem to remember it as a pretty major liability going back to the GSOT days.

Money for a young cog on this Oline is a good investment.

That came up below. Martz was bad at drafting. He inherited 2 (Miller and Tucker) and then lost both and the best he could do was Barron. In fact I would deepen the whole indictment of Martz's personnel acquisition skills by saying, you want to know how bad Martz was at that? He couldn't even find a right tackle. cool smiley Meanwhile since Barron and Smith the Rams have had 3--Richardson (who had the best year in his career as a Ram), and Barksdale (who played pretty well till he left), and then Hav who replaced Barksdale when Barksdale held out. Anyway, as I said before, if you think this bunch is as bad at the draft as Martz was, then, yeah Hav is irreplaceable.

Teams don't build their OLs around the ROT for a reason. Plus, in my view, spending money for the more easily replaced right tackle position means you don't have the money somewhere else for a less easily replaced position (like a top guard, center, or left tackle). And anyway, going forward, it would help Goff if they had another tackle who was good at pass pro (not Hav's strength).

....



Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 01/04/2019 06:25PM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  PFF’s 5 highest graded Rams of 2018 season...

Rams43877January 03, 2019 06:24AM

  Re: PFF’s 5 highest graded Rams of 2018 season...

CraigMatson252January 03, 2019 09:13AM

  anyone think extending Havenstein was bad idea?

max378January 03, 2019 11:23AM

  I loved the extension

stlramz179January 03, 2019 11:40AM

  Actually I don't recall any real issues...

jemach189January 03, 2019 04:51PM

  I did, it was a bad idea

zn203January 03, 2019 06:30PM

  Re: Maybe it wasn't so bad...

dzrams224January 03, 2019 07:05PM

  Re: Maybe it wasn't so bad...

zn206January 03, 2019 07:19PM

  In part...

jemach277January 04, 2019 12:47PM

  Re: I did, it was a bad idea

Old Goat142January 04, 2019 04:36PM

  Re: I did, it was a bad idea

zn258January 04, 2019 06:11PM

  Re: I did, it was a bad idea

Rams43118January 04, 2019 10:08PM

  Hav has 8th best win rate in pass pro for an OT

AlbaNY_Ram134January 05, 2019 12:13AM

  Tangent but here are rankings for other rams OL

The Professor120January 05, 2019 10:54AM

  a modest deal, made sense

LMU93142January 04, 2019 03:45AM

  Re: a modest deal, made sense

Rams43128January 04, 2019 07:09AM

  Re: a modest deal, made sense

zn154January 04, 2019 07:15AM

  Re: a modest deal, made sense

Rams43134January 04, 2019 07:51AM

  Re: a modest deal, made sense

LMU93126January 04, 2019 08:18AM

  Re: a modest deal, made sense

zn295January 04, 2019 08:22AM

  So what is the second

PHDram133January 05, 2019 08:51PM

  ROTs are expendable no matter who they

ferragamo79127January 04, 2019 11:55AM

  sure cause he had a couple

zn126January 04, 2019 12:51PM

  ended in 2001

ferragamo79117January 04, 2019 01:00PM

  Re: anyone think extending Havenstein was bad idea?

Coy Bacon138January 04, 2019 11:52AM

  This signing seems very controversial

David Deacon292January 05, 2019 01:53AM

  Re: This signing seems very controversial

LMU93133January 05, 2019 04:09AM

  according to vinnyb.

max180January 05, 2019 04:40AM

  Re: according to vinnyb.

LMU93144January 05, 2019 07:40AM

  Re: according to vinnyb.

Rams43360January 05, 2019 09:20AM

  Re: according to vinnyb.

max302January 05, 2019 09:45AM

  This makes a lot of sense to me...

jemach118January 05, 2019 12:39PM

  Re: It's too soon to say on Peters....

dzrams130January 05, 2019 03:28PM

  Sully

hubestar173January 06, 2019 01:14AM

  Re: Sully

zn113January 06, 2019 03:44AM