Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

I did, it was a bad idea

January 03, 2019 06:30PM
Quote
jemach
stated on this board with the signing.

Overall looked at as a good move and sets up cap help for future years.

Has nothing to do with how well Hav played, you can replace a right tackle more easily than any other position on the OL.

AND since they they can only have so many big contracts, extending a right tackle is questionable. When they have Donald and Goff both under extensions they can afford at best 6-7 other big contracts. Why would you use one on a ROT? That means you leave off someone who plays a position where it's harder to find good players.

There's a reason ROT is THE lowest paid position among NFL starters (looking just at the 22 O and D starters, not special teamers). It's because it's far easier to find a good replacement at ROT than most positions on an NFL roster.

And as a matter of fact the Rams seem to be cognizant of all that, since his extension is the only one of the ones they signed recently where the team can get out of it by dropping him after 2019 with no cap hit. No other Rams extension is structured that way.

BTW although Hav is ranked high in run blocking, he is much lower in pass pro.

...
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  PFF’s 5 highest graded Rams of 2018 season...

Rams43872January 03, 2019 06:24AM

  Re: PFF’s 5 highest graded Rams of 2018 season...

CraigMatson252January 03, 2019 09:13AM

  anyone think extending Havenstein was bad idea?

max378January 03, 2019 11:23AM

  I loved the extension

stlramz179January 03, 2019 11:40AM

  Actually I don't recall any real issues...

jemach189January 03, 2019 04:51PM

  I did, it was a bad idea

zn202January 03, 2019 06:30PM

  Re: Maybe it wasn't so bad...

dzrams224January 03, 2019 07:05PM

  Re: Maybe it wasn't so bad...

zn206January 03, 2019 07:19PM

  In part...

jemach277January 04, 2019 12:47PM

  Re: I did, it was a bad idea

Old Goat141January 04, 2019 04:36PM

  Re: I did, it was a bad idea

zn258January 04, 2019 06:11PM

  Re: I did, it was a bad idea

Rams43117January 04, 2019 10:08PM

  Hav has 8th best win rate in pass pro for an OT

AlbaNY_Ram132January 05, 2019 12:13AM

  Tangent but here are rankings for other rams OL

The Professor119January 05, 2019 10:54AM

  a modest deal, made sense

LMU93142January 04, 2019 03:45AM

  Re: a modest deal, made sense

Rams43127January 04, 2019 07:09AM

  Re: a modest deal, made sense

zn153January 04, 2019 07:15AM

  Re: a modest deal, made sense

Rams43132January 04, 2019 07:51AM

  Re: a modest deal, made sense

LMU93125January 04, 2019 08:18AM

  Re: a modest deal, made sense

zn295January 04, 2019 08:22AM

  So what is the second

PHDram133January 05, 2019 08:51PM

  ROTs are expendable no matter who they

ferragamo79127January 04, 2019 11:55AM

  sure cause he had a couple

zn126January 04, 2019 12:51PM

  ended in 2001

ferragamo79116January 04, 2019 01:00PM

  Re: anyone think extending Havenstein was bad idea?

Coy Bacon137January 04, 2019 11:52AM

  This signing seems very controversial

David Deacon291January 05, 2019 01:53AM

  Re: This signing seems very controversial

LMU93132January 05, 2019 04:09AM

  according to vinnyb.

max179January 05, 2019 04:40AM

  Re: according to vinnyb.

LMU93144January 05, 2019 07:40AM

  Re: according to vinnyb.

Rams43354January 05, 2019 09:20AM

  Re: according to vinnyb.

max301January 05, 2019 09:45AM

  This makes a lot of sense to me...

jemach118January 05, 2019 12:39PM

  Re: It's too soon to say on Peters....

dzrams130January 05, 2019 03:28PM

  Sully

hubestar172January 06, 2019 01:14AM

  Re: Sully

zn113January 06, 2019 03:44AM