Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

This signing seems very controversial

January 05, 2019 01:53AM
I think there are some really good reasons for signing Hav's to the extension.

1. Keep the line together for another year except for perhaps Safford if he doesn't resign.
2. We only have 1 more year left for Whit and Sully and need a guy that can provide some stability.
3. He is a really good RT.

On the con side I do think we paid a higher than normal price to keep him although his contract is in line with a good Guard

On balance I don't think it was an okay deal and I think we need a vet when Whit and Sully are gone. Who knows maybe Noteboom has to play LG next year. I do see the logic about not having to replace the entire line over a 2 year period and maintaining some certainty with the unit. If we had a LT and another Guard lock down long term it might make sense to bargain hunt but that is not our situation.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  PFF’s 5 highest graded Rams of 2018 season...

Rams43872January 03, 2019 06:24AM

  Re: PFF’s 5 highest graded Rams of 2018 season...

CraigMatson251January 03, 2019 09:13AM

  anyone think extending Havenstein was bad idea?

max377January 03, 2019 11:23AM

  I loved the extension

stlramz179January 03, 2019 11:40AM

  Actually I don't recall any real issues...

jemach188January 03, 2019 04:51PM

  I did, it was a bad idea

zn202January 03, 2019 06:30PM

  Re: Maybe it wasn't so bad...

dzrams223January 03, 2019 07:05PM

  Re: Maybe it wasn't so bad...

zn206January 03, 2019 07:19PM

  In part...

jemach275January 04, 2019 12:47PM

  Re: I did, it was a bad idea

Old Goat140January 04, 2019 04:36PM

  Re: I did, it was a bad idea

zn258January 04, 2019 06:11PM

  Re: I did, it was a bad idea

Rams43116January 04, 2019 10:08PM

  Hav has 8th best win rate in pass pro for an OT

AlbaNY_Ram132January 05, 2019 12:13AM

  Tangent but here are rankings for other rams OL

The Professor119January 05, 2019 10:54AM

  a modest deal, made sense

LMU93141January 04, 2019 03:45AM

  Re: a modest deal, made sense

Rams43127January 04, 2019 07:09AM

  Re: a modest deal, made sense

zn153January 04, 2019 07:15AM

  Re: a modest deal, made sense

Rams43132January 04, 2019 07:51AM

  Re: a modest deal, made sense

LMU93125January 04, 2019 08:18AM

  Re: a modest deal, made sense

zn294January 04, 2019 08:22AM

  So what is the second

PHDram132January 05, 2019 08:51PM

  ROTs are expendable no matter who they

ferragamo79127January 04, 2019 11:55AM

  sure cause he had a couple

zn125January 04, 2019 12:51PM

  ended in 2001

ferragamo79116January 04, 2019 01:00PM

  Re: anyone think extending Havenstein was bad idea?

Coy Bacon136January 04, 2019 11:52AM

  This signing seems very controversial

David Deacon290January 05, 2019 01:53AM

  Re: This signing seems very controversial

LMU93131January 05, 2019 04:09AM

  according to vinnyb.

max178January 05, 2019 04:40AM

  Re: according to vinnyb.

LMU93143January 05, 2019 07:40AM

  Re: according to vinnyb.

Rams43353January 05, 2019 09:20AM

  Re: according to vinnyb.

max300January 05, 2019 09:45AM

  This makes a lot of sense to me...

jemach117January 05, 2019 12:39PM

  Re: It's too soon to say on Peters....

dzrams130January 05, 2019 03:28PM

  Sully

hubestar171January 06, 2019 01:14AM

  Re: Sully

zn112January 06, 2019 03:44AM