Quote
Ramsdude
Quote
zn
Quote
Ramsdude
Quote
zn
Quote
Ramsdude
Not sure if any of the guys you listed were THE reason the teams won the SB.
I didn't claim they were.
That;s because I would never claim that because NO ONE PLAYER is ever THE reason for a superbowl.
But you DO factor in a team;s best players in the equation. If you don;t, you;'re just being selective and negligent.
Which comes around to this. No team ever got to a superbowl by neglecting, underpaying, and otherwise disparaging their best players.
And. Suh is not the same tier as Donald so trying to make things out of Suh's career simply does not work in any conversation about Donald.
It's funny, the Rams had such a long drafting blight, staring in 2001, that some Rams fans when facing the fact that the Rams actually do have some great players can only imagine ways to downplay or dump them.
As you said: "NO ONE PLAYER is ever THE reason for a superbowl."
That's not all I said. Don't be selective. You distorted my point.
I ALSO said
No team ever got to a superbowl by neglecting, underpaying, and otherwise disparaging their best players.
you DO factor in a team;s best players in the equation. If you don;t, you;'re just being selective and negligent.And yes from my perspective you are trying to do precisely that. To me it comes along with reading a guy who made 2 points and you act like he just made one.
Leaving things out is leaving things out.
And in your discussion of both Donald and superbowl teams you leave out the point I bolded in red there and put 2 different ways.
...
lol...looks like you were "selective" when quoting me too zn. It's ok for you to be selective but not me? Whatever.
Again, you have NO IDEA what the Rams offered OR what AD is asking for so why are you making it sound like they are "neglecting, underpaying, and otherwise disparaging their best players"? You just don't know. You have an opinion just like all of us but that's all it is....an opinion.
I didn't say a thing about what the Rams offered.
I was talking about how you talk about Donald.
You get on this one really uncompelling point that suggests a team's superbowl chances revolves around one not several players. That allows you to wrongly downgrade Donald. My equation stands---you do not have a superbowl team that does not cultivate its best players. You want to act like Donald isn't part of that. He is.
I didn't say a word about what the Rams are doing. I was discussing how you approach the topic.
And there's no point in repeating it endlessly. You trying to find ways to downgrade Donald is you not getting how superbowl teams are built---they have a core of great players and act like they do.
So no I am not going to keep repeating that point. To me it's just flat obvious. If you can't see it you can't see it. So we disagree here but we;ll agree on a different topic in a different thread cause that's how good posting goes.