Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Why?

September 18, 2017 09:58AM
RFIP, I certainly meant nothing personal, I'm just trying to get a step-by-step understanding of what happened.

As I say, I was in a crowded sports bar, so yeah-- Blandino's explanation was not "to my approval" because I did not hear it.

If I'm able to find a replay of the game with sound, I will definitely check it out.

A basic question I still have (again, because I could not hear the broadcast well)-- did the Rams infraction occur while the ball was in flight, or did it occur after the returner fielded it? Because if the infraction occurred occurred after the returner fielded it, than the infraction normally would be enforced at the spot of the infraction.

BTW, I believe the rules governing "double fouls during change of possession" were fundamentally changed in 2016.

Again, nothing personal whatsoever, just trying to get clarity on what for me is an interesting problem. Bottom line, given that Washington committed a personal foul, I would be curious about a step-by-step explanation of why on earth the Rams would be forced to take possession at their own two yard line. To me, getting clarity on whether the infraction occurred "in flight" or "during the return" would be helpful.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  So the call on the Kickoff??

Headslap751030September 17, 2017 05:00PM

  Re: So the call on the Kickoff??

NorCalRamFan398September 17, 2017 05:12PM

  the penalties offset and nullified the return

Atlantic Ram401September 17, 2017 06:10PM

  Re: the penalties offset and nullified the return

Headslap75374September 17, 2017 06:16PM

  Sounds right

Atlantic Ram345September 17, 2017 07:44PM

  Re: the penalties offset and nullified the return

XXXIVwin352September 17, 2017 09:19PM

  Re: the penalties offset and nullified the return

XXXIVwin312September 17, 2017 10:46PM

  Here's what you are missing

RFIP300September 18, 2017 12:38AM

  kind of like the Tuck Rule........

21Dog265September 18, 2017 04:11AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Headslap75261September 18, 2017 08:03AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Headslap75288September 18, 2017 08:06AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

XXXIVwin270September 18, 2017 08:34AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

RFIP266September 18, 2017 08:59AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Rampage2K-238September 18, 2017 09:09AM

  Touch back..nm

RFIP249September 18, 2017 09:22AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

XXXIVwin240September 18, 2017 09:17AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Rampage2K-264September 18, 2017 09:22AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

XXXIVwin273September 18, 2017 09:24AM

  Why?

RFIP251September 18, 2017 09:28AM

  Re: Why?

XXXIVwin274September 18, 2017 09:58AM

  Re: Why?

RFIP246September 18, 2017 10:02AM

  Re: Why?

XXXIVwin250September 18, 2017 10:07AM

  Re: Why?

Rampage2K-252September 18, 2017 10:27AM

  Re: Why?

XXXIVwin239September 18, 2017 10:39AM

  Bad rule correctly enforced

XXXIVwin252September 18, 2017 09:21PM

  Re: Bad rule correctly enforced

Rampage2K-229September 19, 2017 07:39AM

  Re: Bad rule correctly enforced

XXXIVwin242September 19, 2017 09:01AM

  and he did explain it...nm

RFIP210September 18, 2017 10:53AM

  Re: You're wrong....

Rampage2K-237September 18, 2017 11:07AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

RFIP227September 18, 2017 09:27AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Rampage2K-242September 18, 2017 09:31AM

  A truly bizarre rule

sacram383September 17, 2017 06:18PM

  Do the Rams seem to get a lot of holding penalties

Atlantic Ram322September 17, 2017 07:49PM

  Re: Do the Rams seem to get a lot of holding penalties

DESERT RAM316September 17, 2017 08:48PM

  Re: Do the Rams seem to get a lot of holding penalties

sacram248September 18, 2017 07:43AM

  why bother returning a KO

ferragamo79255September 18, 2017 09:29AM

  My thoughts exactly BUT

RFIP248September 18, 2017 09:43AM