Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: the penalties offset and nullified the return

September 17, 2017 09:19PM
I think your hypothetical scenario is completely right, Headslap.
I can only hope that Boger screwed up the call. Because if they enforced the rule correctly, then it's the worst rule ever.
How can one conceive of a rule where committing a personal foul becomes a huge advantage to your own team??? I really hope this play gets the attention it deserves from the rest of the NFL.
What's a coach supposed to say-- "if you noticed the refs threw a flag because you were being held on a kick return, then hurry up and grab somebody's facemask before the play is over!" I hope the NFL does an apology for this one-- what a mess.
One more thing: Sounds like this is a brand new rule this year, one that they passed in an attempt to "speed up the flow of the game." They wanted to prevent the old recurring scenario where offsetting penalties result in a re-kick.
But making an incentive for a personal foul...? I just hope Boger screwed it up, I hope the new rule isn't actually this dumb...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/17/2017 09:24PM by XXXIVwin.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  So the call on the Kickoff??

Headslap751030September 17, 2017 05:00PM

  Re: So the call on the Kickoff??

NorCalRamFan398September 17, 2017 05:12PM

  the penalties offset and nullified the return

Atlantic Ram401September 17, 2017 06:10PM

  Re: the penalties offset and nullified the return

Headslap75373September 17, 2017 06:16PM

  Sounds right

Atlantic Ram345September 17, 2017 07:44PM

  Re: the penalties offset and nullified the return

XXXIVwin351September 17, 2017 09:19PM

  Re: the penalties offset and nullified the return

XXXIVwin311September 17, 2017 10:46PM

  Here's what you are missing

RFIP300September 18, 2017 12:38AM

  kind of like the Tuck Rule........

21Dog265September 18, 2017 04:11AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Headslap75260September 18, 2017 08:03AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Headslap75287September 18, 2017 08:06AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

XXXIVwin270September 18, 2017 08:34AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

RFIP266September 18, 2017 08:59AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Rampage2K-237September 18, 2017 09:09AM

  Touch back..nm

RFIP248September 18, 2017 09:22AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

XXXIVwin239September 18, 2017 09:17AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Rampage2K-263September 18, 2017 09:22AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

XXXIVwin272September 18, 2017 09:24AM

  Why?

RFIP251September 18, 2017 09:28AM

  Re: Why?

XXXIVwin274September 18, 2017 09:58AM

  Re: Why?

RFIP245September 18, 2017 10:02AM

  Re: Why?

XXXIVwin249September 18, 2017 10:07AM

  Re: Why?

Rampage2K-252September 18, 2017 10:27AM

  Re: Why?

XXXIVwin238September 18, 2017 10:39AM

  Bad rule correctly enforced

XXXIVwin252September 18, 2017 09:21PM

  Re: Bad rule correctly enforced

Rampage2K-229September 19, 2017 07:39AM

  Re: Bad rule correctly enforced

XXXIVwin242September 19, 2017 09:01AM

  and he did explain it...nm

RFIP210September 18, 2017 10:53AM

  Re: You're wrong....

Rampage2K-236September 18, 2017 11:07AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

RFIP227September 18, 2017 09:27AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Rampage2K-242September 18, 2017 09:31AM

  A truly bizarre rule

sacram382September 17, 2017 06:18PM

  Do the Rams seem to get a lot of holding penalties

Atlantic Ram321September 17, 2017 07:49PM

  Re: Do the Rams seem to get a lot of holding penalties

DESERT RAM316September 17, 2017 08:48PM

  Re: Do the Rams seem to get a lot of holding penalties

sacram248September 18, 2017 07:43AM

  why bother returning a KO

ferragamo79255September 18, 2017 09:29AM

  My thoughts exactly BUT

RFIP248September 18, 2017 09:43AM