Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Why?

September 18, 2017 10:27AM
Quote
XXXIVwin
Well, if the defense was offside, I think technically an infraction occurred "before the play" so they just march off five yards against the defense, and the holding call is ignored because the play "never happened."

But yes-- if there was a play from scrimmage with both offensive holding and defensive holding, then, yes-- they re-play the down from the previous spot.

Again, just wondering what would have been the correct spot on the Rams kickoff return play if the Washington personal foul had not occurred.

And still curious if the Rams infraction occurred "in flight" or "after the catch."

It was never explained at all by Blandino, just said something about that being the rule... The commentators were very confused by that, as most of us were.

It was botched, and there is no argument for it IMO.

Like I said, so if Cooper caught it in the endzone and ran it out to the two yard line...we would have been rewarded with the ball being placed at the 25??? Makes no sense what so ever.



[www.instagram.com]
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  So the call on the Kickoff??

Headslap751030September 17, 2017 05:00PM

  Re: So the call on the Kickoff??

NorCalRamFan397September 17, 2017 05:12PM

  the penalties offset and nullified the return

Atlantic Ram401September 17, 2017 06:10PM

  Re: the penalties offset and nullified the return

Headslap75373September 17, 2017 06:16PM

  Sounds right

Atlantic Ram344September 17, 2017 07:44PM

  Re: the penalties offset and nullified the return

XXXIVwin351September 17, 2017 09:19PM

  Re: the penalties offset and nullified the return

XXXIVwin311September 17, 2017 10:46PM

  Here's what you are missing

RFIP300September 18, 2017 12:38AM

  kind of like the Tuck Rule........

21Dog264September 18, 2017 04:11AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Headslap75260September 18, 2017 08:03AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Headslap75287September 18, 2017 08:06AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

XXXIVwin269September 18, 2017 08:34AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

RFIP265September 18, 2017 08:59AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Rampage2K-237September 18, 2017 09:09AM

  Touch back..nm

RFIP248September 18, 2017 09:22AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

XXXIVwin239September 18, 2017 09:17AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Rampage2K-263September 18, 2017 09:22AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

XXXIVwin272September 18, 2017 09:24AM

  Why?

RFIP250September 18, 2017 09:28AM

  Re: Why?

XXXIVwin274September 18, 2017 09:58AM

  Re: Why?

RFIP245September 18, 2017 10:02AM

  Re: Why?

XXXIVwin249September 18, 2017 10:07AM

  Re: Why?

Rampage2K-251September 18, 2017 10:27AM

  Re: Why?

XXXIVwin238September 18, 2017 10:39AM

  Bad rule correctly enforced

XXXIVwin252September 18, 2017 09:21PM

  Re: Bad rule correctly enforced

Rampage2K-228September 19, 2017 07:39AM

  Re: Bad rule correctly enforced

XXXIVwin241September 19, 2017 09:01AM

  and he did explain it...nm

RFIP209September 18, 2017 10:53AM

  Re: You're wrong....

Rampage2K-236September 18, 2017 11:07AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

RFIP226September 18, 2017 09:27AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Rampage2K-241September 18, 2017 09:31AM

  A truly bizarre rule

sacram382September 17, 2017 06:18PM

  Do the Rams seem to get a lot of holding penalties

Atlantic Ram321September 17, 2017 07:49PM

  Re: Do the Rams seem to get a lot of holding penalties

DESERT RAM316September 17, 2017 08:48PM

  Re: Do the Rams seem to get a lot of holding penalties

sacram247September 18, 2017 07:43AM

  why bother returning a KO

ferragamo79254September 18, 2017 09:29AM

  My thoughts exactly BUT

RFIP247September 18, 2017 09:43AM