Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Bad rule correctly enforced

September 19, 2017 09:01AM
Rampage, the "reasoning" for this 2016 rule change was the following:

Effect: Eliminates multiple spots of enforcement for a double foul after a change of possession.
Reason: Simplifies penalty enforcement.​


Ostensibly, the rule change was put into place to make things simpler.

My take: the NFL has clearly stated their intention to give teams the incentive to accept touchbacks and start at the 25. The kickoff return is considered to be the most violent play in the game, with large men running at each other at full speed. The chance for life-threatening injuries are highest during kickoff returns. The NFL is (supposedly) interested in player safety, and they do not want the bad publicity of a major injury happening during a kick return.

THEREFORE-- the NFL passed this rule knowing that it had the potential to disproportionately punish the receiving team. The NFL adjusted the rules to make it even more clear that returning a kickoff is a big risk for field position.

I think there are many ways this new rule could be tweaked so that it does not punish the receiving team so disproportionately. It will be interesting to see how other fans and teams react when this rule is applied in the future.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  So the call on the Kickoff??

Headslap751030September 17, 2017 05:00PM

  Re: So the call on the Kickoff??

NorCalRamFan397September 17, 2017 05:12PM

  the penalties offset and nullified the return

Atlantic Ram401September 17, 2017 06:10PM

  Re: the penalties offset and nullified the return

Headslap75373September 17, 2017 06:16PM

  Sounds right

Atlantic Ram344September 17, 2017 07:44PM

  Re: the penalties offset and nullified the return

XXXIVwin351September 17, 2017 09:19PM

  Re: the penalties offset and nullified the return

XXXIVwin311September 17, 2017 10:46PM

  Here's what you are missing

RFIP300September 18, 2017 12:38AM

  kind of like the Tuck Rule........

21Dog264September 18, 2017 04:11AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Headslap75260September 18, 2017 08:03AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Headslap75287September 18, 2017 08:06AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

XXXIVwin269September 18, 2017 08:34AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

RFIP265September 18, 2017 08:59AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Rampage2K-237September 18, 2017 09:09AM

  Touch back..nm

RFIP248September 18, 2017 09:22AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

XXXIVwin239September 18, 2017 09:17AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Rampage2K-263September 18, 2017 09:22AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

XXXIVwin272September 18, 2017 09:24AM

  Why?

RFIP250September 18, 2017 09:28AM

  Re: Why?

XXXIVwin274September 18, 2017 09:58AM

  Re: Why?

RFIP245September 18, 2017 10:02AM

  Re: Why?

XXXIVwin249September 18, 2017 10:07AM

  Re: Why?

Rampage2K-252September 18, 2017 10:27AM

  Re: Why?

XXXIVwin238September 18, 2017 10:39AM

  Bad rule correctly enforced

XXXIVwin252September 18, 2017 09:21PM

  Re: Bad rule correctly enforced

Rampage2K-228September 19, 2017 07:39AM

  Re: Bad rule correctly enforced

XXXIVwin241September 19, 2017 09:01AM

  and he did explain it...nm

RFIP209September 18, 2017 10:53AM

  Re: You're wrong....

Rampage2K-236September 18, 2017 11:07AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

RFIP226September 18, 2017 09:27AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Rampage2K-241September 18, 2017 09:31AM

  A truly bizarre rule

sacram382September 17, 2017 06:18PM

  Do the Rams seem to get a lot of holding penalties

Atlantic Ram321September 17, 2017 07:49PM

  Re: Do the Rams seem to get a lot of holding penalties

DESERT RAM316September 17, 2017 08:48PM

  Re: Do the Rams seem to get a lot of holding penalties

sacram247September 18, 2017 07:43AM

  why bother returning a KO

ferragamo79254September 18, 2017 09:29AM

  My thoughts exactly BUT

RFIP247September 18, 2017 09:43AM