September 17, 2017 09:19PM
I think your hypothetical scenario is completely right, Headslap.
I can only hope that Boger screwed up the call. Because if they enforced the rule correctly, then it's the worst rule ever.
How can one conceive of a rule where committing a personal foul becomes a huge advantage to your own team??? I really hope this play gets the attention it deserves from the rest of the NFL.
What's a coach supposed to say-- "if you noticed the refs threw a flag because you were being held on a kick return, then hurry up and grab somebody's facemask before the play is over!" I hope the NFL does an apology for this one-- what a mess.
One more thing: Sounds like this is a brand new rule this year, one that they passed in an attempt to "speed up the flow of the game." They wanted to prevent the old recurring scenario where offsetting penalties result in a re-kick.
But making an incentive for a personal foul...? I just hope Boger screwed it up, I hope the new rule isn't actually this dumb...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/17/2017 09:24PM by XXXIVwin.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  So the call on the Kickoff??

Headslap751033September 17, 2017 05:00PM

  Re: So the call on the Kickoff??

NorCalRamFan399September 17, 2017 05:12PM

  the penalties offset and nullified the return

Atlantic Ram401September 17, 2017 06:10PM

  Re: the penalties offset and nullified the return

Headslap75375September 17, 2017 06:16PM

  Sounds right

Atlantic Ram347September 17, 2017 07:44PM

  Re: the penalties offset and nullified the return

XXXIVwin353September 17, 2017 09:19PM

  Re: the penalties offset and nullified the return

XXXIVwin314September 17, 2017 10:46PM

  Here's what you are missing

RFIP301September 18, 2017 12:38AM

  kind of like the Tuck Rule........

21Dog266September 18, 2017 04:11AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Headslap75262September 18, 2017 08:03AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Headslap75290September 18, 2017 08:06AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

XXXIVwin271September 18, 2017 08:34AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

RFIP267September 18, 2017 08:59AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Rampage2K-238September 18, 2017 09:09AM

  Touch back..nm

RFIP250September 18, 2017 09:22AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

XXXIVwin241September 18, 2017 09:17AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Rampage2K-266September 18, 2017 09:22AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

XXXIVwin273September 18, 2017 09:24AM

  Why?

RFIP253September 18, 2017 09:28AM

  Re: Why?

XXXIVwin276September 18, 2017 09:58AM

  Re: Why?

RFIP246September 18, 2017 10:02AM

  Re: Why?

XXXIVwin251September 18, 2017 10:07AM

  Re: Why?

Rampage2K-252September 18, 2017 10:27AM

  Re: Why?

XXXIVwin240September 18, 2017 10:39AM

  Bad rule correctly enforced

XXXIVwin254September 18, 2017 09:21PM

  Re: Bad rule correctly enforced

Rampage2K-230September 19, 2017 07:39AM

  Re: Bad rule correctly enforced

XXXIVwin242September 19, 2017 09:01AM

  and he did explain it...nm

RFIP212September 18, 2017 10:53AM

  Re: You're wrong....

Rampage2K-239September 18, 2017 11:07AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

RFIP227September 18, 2017 09:27AM

  Re: Here's what you are missing

Rampage2K-243September 18, 2017 09:31AM

  A truly bizarre rule

sacram385September 17, 2017 06:18PM

  Do the Rams seem to get a lot of holding penalties

Atlantic Ram324September 17, 2017 07:49PM

  Re: Do the Rams seem to get a lot of holding penalties

DESERT RAM319September 17, 2017 08:48PM

  Re: Do the Rams seem to get a lot of holding penalties

sacram249September 18, 2017 07:43AM

  why bother returning a KO

ferragamo79256September 18, 2017 09:29AM

  My thoughts exactly BUT

RFIP250September 18, 2017 09:43AM