Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: it's ironic how many people claim THEY are the objective ones

November 23, 2020 12:08PM
Quote
zn
Quote
Ram_Ruler

Goff is average to good.

It's amazing how many people declare their opinion is the "objective" one.

It is actually too soon to say what Goff IS though I am glad that you like everyone else have another unobjective opinion.

Here a fact though. You would be hard pressed to name any qb who did NOT have bad games in their 5th year. That means that have a couple of bad games in your 5th year does not describe your overall standing as a qb.

That means it's all still an open question.

I say he improves from his play in the 2nd quarter of 2020, and turns out to be be better than avg. or just good. You say different. The only "objective" statement here is that objectively, we have 2 different opinions.
No, "objectively" Goff has ranked well below average since the KC game in 2018. That's good games and bad games, vs. good teams and bad teams, with all manner of situations. Compared to all other QB's, his numbers have been less than mediocre. That isn't an opinion or subjective. It's empirical, objective numbers.

After 5 years in the league, even at his young age, it's hard not to consider that he might already be what he's going to be. That isn't to say that he can't improve but there is considerable data available to form an opinion of what he is as an NFL QB. After 5 years, most QB's don't suddenly transition to the next level and become something different. It's possible and I'm sure many here are hoping for it but that doesn't make it something to plan around. Or to suggest we can't say what Goff is because his career isn't over. What he is and what he will be are two different things. But what he currently is, crystallizes as each week goes by.

I find it an interesting exercise to apply the same mindset to someone that you don't have an emotional interest in. One's hope for Goff is, IMO, going to skew their perception. So, would you argue so strongly that the numbers aren't suggestive or indicative of what a QB is and his chances for consistent, elite level of play for...Teddy Bridgewater?
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Interesting.

NewMexicoRam1317November 22, 2020 04:25PM

  Re: Interesting.

stlrams13312November 22, 2020 04:36PM

  Puhleese

Deadhead Ram315November 22, 2020 05:06PM

  I was talking about Rodgers. NM

NewMexicoRam268November 22, 2020 06:14PM

  so is Rodgers lmbo!!!

Speed_Kills216November 22, 2020 06:17PM

  Point is....

NewMexicoRam239November 22, 2020 06:29PM

  ok but

Speed_Kills237November 22, 2020 06:31PM

  Re: ok but

Rampage2K-199November 22, 2020 07:56PM

  Re: ok but

moklerman173November 22, 2020 10:18PM

  Re: no they wouldn’t

Speed_Kills282November 23, 2020 03:05AM

  Re: no they wouldn’t

Rampage2K-273November 23, 2020 07:01AM

  That's the point. NM

NewMexicoRam144November 23, 2020 03:51AM

  these posts have become ironic

Ram_Ruler231November 23, 2020 02:16AM

  Re: these posts have become ironic

Leoram588November 23, 2020 03:00AM

  "Average Joe" Goff's Career vs the NFL Top 5

MalibuRam192November 23, 2020 03:39AM

  Yep. Good point. nm

NewMexicoRam133November 23, 2020 03:55AM

  Depends on what he did in those wins, right?

Ram_Ruler299November 23, 2020 04:19AM

  This is 100 percent my perspective

Ram_Ruler200November 23, 2020 04:21AM

  Goff is just not as talented, that's why

six2stack429November 23, 2020 04:57AM

  Re: Goff is just not as talented, that's why

MalibuRam158November 23, 2020 05:35AM

  He’s got the arm talent. The problem isn’t talent.

max193November 23, 2020 05:47AM

  Re: He’s got the arm talent. The problem isn’t talent.

Ramsdude130November 23, 2020 06:37AM

  Re: He’s got the arm talent. The problem isn’t talent.

MalibuRam138November 23, 2020 06:42AM

  Re: He’s got the arm talent. The problem isn’t talent.

RamsDynasty130November 23, 2020 07:04AM

  Re: Goff is just not as talented, that's why

six2stack176November 23, 2020 07:42AM

  Re: Goff is just not as talented, that's why

Rampage2K-220November 23, 2020 07:51AM

  Re: these posts have become ironic

Rams43203November 23, 2020 06:37AM

  Re: these posts have become ironic

max214November 23, 2020 07:31AM

  Re: these posts have become ironic

MalibuRam145November 23, 2020 08:11AM

  Re: these posts have become ironic

Rams43134November 23, 2020 08:23AM

  Re: these posts have become ironic

max113November 23, 2020 10:50AM

  Re: these posts have become ironic

MalibuRam131November 23, 2020 08:47AM

  Re: Thank you! The comparisons are really silly!...nm

dzrams134November 23, 2020 09:35AM

  it's ironic how many people claim THEY are the objective ones

zn127November 23, 2020 10:33AM

  Re: it's ironic how many people claim THEY are the objective ones

moklerman154November 23, 2020 12:08PM

  Re: it's ironic how many people claim THEY are the objective ones

MalibuRam249November 23, 2020 01:43PM

  Re: it's ironic how many people claim THEY are the objective ones

zn719November 23, 2020 02:02PM

  Re: it's ironic how many people claim THEY are the objective ones

MalibuRam530November 23, 2020 02:48PM

  Re: it's ironic how many people claim THEY are the objective ones

zn155November 23, 2020 03:01PM

  Re: it's ironic how many people claim THEY are the objective ones

Rampage2K-134November 23, 2020 02:29PM

  Re: it's ironic how many people claim THEY are the objective ones

moklerman246November 23, 2020 02:58PM

  Re: This is how I understood his objective claim...

dzrams143November 23, 2020 02:01PM

  I know full well what he said

zn224November 23, 2020 02:08PM

  Re: I know full well what he said

dzrams175November 23, 2020 02:17PM

  no...it's not

zn119November 23, 2020 02:31PM

  Re: I don't argue after great wins....lol...nm

dzrams120November 23, 2020 06:44PM

  Re: I don't argue after great wins....lol...

zn246November 23, 2020 07:11PM