Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Good question

January 15, 2019 08:45AM
Quote
AlbaNY_Ram
I agree with your take on the change in the Rams strategy on offense but I have a question: why hasn't abandoning the longer passes led to an increase in completion percentage?
I also wonder why Goff isn't as efficient as he was before. The Rams have employed a strong running game for stretches before and not asked Goff to throw it as much and he was very productive in the process. The great run game and really good pass pro should be opening things up but maybe teams are still willing to give up the run and guarding the back end?

Somebody mentioned the first red zone trip against Dallas where the blitzer came free and what I took from that play was Goff didn't see Gurley or Cooks wide open over the middle and basically just threw it away against single coverage(I think). If he wanted to get it out quickly it seemed like a bad throw and if he wanted to extend the play, he didn't even try. Just looked like a throwaway when there were options. Which supports the idea that he is on orders to not turn the ball over or take a sack as a priority.

Hopefully, if that's the case, he has improved to the point where he's allowed to start being a little more aggressive again. As a nitpick though, if McVay is focusing on Goff protecting the ball and not simply losing it at times when the pocket's dirty, the fumble late in the game had to be a step back. It's tough though. You can't focus on it too much or it becomes a distraction. Keep telling a guy to not think about fumbling and that's all he's going to think about. On that play I don't know if Woods was out of position or if Goff was careless with the ball but the bottom line is they had a fumble at a critical point in the game on a simple handoff/RPO.

Can't have that against NO.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  McVay, Goff, and the OL

max688January 15, 2019 03:10AM

  Re: McVay, Goff, and the OL

LMU93290January 15, 2019 03:23AM

  Re: McVay, Goff, and the OL

den-the-coach253January 15, 2019 03:43AM

  Re: McVay, Goff, and the OL

LMU93343January 15, 2019 03:48AM

  Re: McVay, Goff, and the OL

max226January 15, 2019 04:01AM

  Re: A stat line close to the SF would serve the Rams well

Speed_Kills307January 15, 2019 06:12AM

  I think it reflects what McVay wants for the playoffs - no turnovers.

Saguaro238January 15, 2019 04:10AM

  Re: I think it reflects what McVay wants for the playoffs - no turnovers.

PHDram228January 15, 2019 04:35AM

  Re: McVay, Goff, and the OL

Steve193January 15, 2019 05:54AM

  Re: the bottom line is they have pulled back the offense

Speed_Kills186January 15, 2019 06:09AM

  Re: the bottom line is they have pulled back the offense

Rams43197January 15, 2019 07:11AM

  Re: the bottom line is they have pulled back the offense

AlbaNY_Ram189January 15, 2019 07:38AM

  Good question

moklerman161January 15, 2019 08:45AM

  Re: the bottom line is they have pulled back the offense

JYB164January 15, 2019 04:03PM

  Change of strategy perhaps

Coy Bacon226January 15, 2019 07:42AM

  It's playoff football: that means no turnovers, solid D, and running the ball

RockRam220January 15, 2019 10:26AM

  Re: the changes are about Kupp being out

merlin224January 15, 2019 01:19PM

  disagree: the changes are about Kupp being out

Coy Bacon216January 15, 2019 04:14PM

  Fans are too Stats Oriented

LBRamsFan217January 15, 2019 01:30PM