Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: If we're gonna talk about ridiculous...

July 30, 2018 11:08AM
Quote
ferragamo79
I draft Tye Hill or Sam Bradford or Greg Robison and pay them a lot and they don't perform. I ask for my money back.....oh yeah, doesn't work that way.

and your example of real world is ridiculous: So I scrimp and save take some risks and open a coffee shop....let's say I even buy a starbucks franchise. I have an employee who is really good and sells a lot of coffee and brings in customers who rave about their customer service. Do I give them a percentage of the franchise? Instead of paying them $11 and hour do I pay the $75 an hour.....they can quit and demand that from another coffee shop....yeah

Let's start with the example you used. It's such an exaggeration that it's meaningless.

If you had an awesome employee, no you're not gonna pay them 7 times as much. That's so exaggerated it's absurd. eye popping smiley

If they really are a valuable employee and bringing in new business, you may want to give them a raise that makes them the highest paid barista in the city. Let's say that would be $13 per hour instead of the $11 you're doing. And if you really wanted to ensure they don't get away it wouldn't kill you to give that most amazing barista ever $15/hour. That's about a 20% overpayment. (19% BTW is the difference between what the Rams are reportedly offering ($21M) and what AD is reportedly demanding ($25M))

What I'm saying is, said most amazing barista ever could probably go to another coffee shop in town and get that $15 they seek.

That's the main point. Your employee would be able to immediately leave and/or shop their services around. CBA bound NFL players cannot do that until after 5 years. Surely you would agree that if said most amazing barista ever was locked into serving your starbucks for 5 years, they would be at a severe disadvantage?

I've already acknowledged that are times where a player underperforms giving the team a raw deal. The difference is, there is an escape mechanism where the team can get out of that bad deal. Surely you see the difference?
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Donald's holdout is pure greed and not altruism.

RockRam766July 30, 2018 03:22AM

  Agree - strongly - greed and ego - NM

YOUNGBLOOD85367July 30, 2018 03:43AM

  have to disagree

zn333July 30, 2018 04:07AM

  Understand. Ethics simply aren't in your wheelhouse for sports contracts.

RockRam295July 30, 2018 06:01AM

  that is simply not true

zn294July 30, 2018 06:09AM

  Re: that is simply not true

BarryRams295July 30, 2018 07:15AM

  So can owners revoke contract for underachievers?

ferragamo79451July 30, 2018 07:40AM

  no one in this situation is demanding a new contract though

zn245July 30, 2018 08:11AM

  Re: Not necessary...

dzrams229July 30, 2018 08:16AM

  keep in mind it works both ways

ferragamo79210July 30, 2018 09:25AM

  Re: keep in mind it works both ways

dzrams180July 30, 2018 09:44AM

  we are talking 1st rounders here

ferragamo79195July 30, 2018 12:16PM

  with this caveat

zn229July 30, 2018 08:04AM

  +1 + more

Ramadune243July 30, 2018 07:50AM

  So if you were Donald you would just play out the contract

Atlantic Ram239July 30, 2018 10:24AM

  Re: EGO & Is AD as valuable as a QB (LOL)

Steve168July 30, 2018 10:41AM

  what is "qb money"?

zn308July 30, 2018 01:55PM

  Re: Are value and impact synonymous?

dzrams193July 30, 2018 02:21PM

  Re: and dont forget...

spagsbacker403July 30, 2018 04:19AM

  Have to agree

Ramsdude251July 30, 2018 05:11AM

  I see it the same way.

GlacieRam511July 30, 2018 05:57AM

  Nah, the issue is the CAP

max230July 30, 2018 06:17AM

  Re: If there was no cap then

Speed_Kills263July 30, 2018 06:55AM

  +1

Ramadune225July 30, 2018 06:58AM

  Re: If there was no cap then

VANRAM239July 30, 2018 07:01AM

  Re: Yes, ALL NFL TEAMS have the same $$$$$.

oldschoolramfan466July 30, 2018 07:07AM

  No thanks.

DaJudge216July 30, 2018 07:02AM

  Good idea.

CeeZar214July 30, 2018 07:12AM

  REALLY REALLY Good idea!

Ramadune352July 30, 2018 01:04PM

  I agree with RamUK

CeeZar259July 30, 2018 06:47AM

  Re: I agree with RamUK

jim beam208July 30, 2018 07:55AM

  Re: I agree with RamUK

Ramboni200July 30, 2018 12:19PM

  Re: I agree and I don't blame him

Coy Bacon199July 30, 2018 07:20AM

  I agree more with ZN

Dram220July 30, 2018 07:34AM

  Re: Donald's holdout is pure greed and not altruism.

cool_hand_luke203July 30, 2018 07:50AM

  wish my boss shared the wealth with me

ferragamo79205July 30, 2018 09:26AM

  Re: wish my boss shared the wealth with me

zn217July 30, 2018 09:32AM

  Re: In the real world...

dzrams168July 30, 2018 09:48AM

  but I am making comparisons

ferragamo79244July 30, 2018 10:25AM

  Re: If we're gonna talk about ridiculous...

dzrams235July 30, 2018 11:08AM

  yet Donald was making 1.8 million last year

ferragamo79249July 30, 2018 12:45PM

  Re: On the importance of AD....

dzrams205July 30, 2018 08:47AM

  I always add this qualification

zn222July 30, 2018 10:08AM

  Re: Donald's holdout is pure greed by a notorious agent

Rampage2K-230July 30, 2018 09:29AM

  Typical...

jemach232July 30, 2018 09:38AM

  How are you coming up with this?

Atlantic Ram221July 30, 2018 09:59AM

  GLUTTONY GLUTTONY!!!! And the sad thing is.....

Ramgator264July 30, 2018 10:02AM

  I tend to think his holdout is misguided not greedy

David Deacon188July 30, 2018 03:05PM

  Oh, AD will show up...

Rams43219July 30, 2018 03:13PM

  Re: Oh, AD will show up...

oldschoolramfan201July 30, 2018 04:00PM

  anyway

zn281July 30, 2018 07:18PM

  Re: anyway

k3222July 31, 2018 02:47PM

  Re: anyway

bigjimram21166August 01, 2018 03:14PM

  Re: Donald's holdout is pure greed and not altruism.

The Professor181July 31, 2018 12:49PM