Hi. I don't respond to those kinds of point by point posts, as a rule. It's too hard to format the response. That's not personal. I say that to everyone who does that. I just can't and don't respond to them.
Either way we're just going to end up repeating ourselves. As we already are. Which is the more important point.
I say there's ample evidence, for a long time, from outside reporters allowed in to participants like McVay, for how they set up their draft process. I also don't think that's th kind of thing a large group of different individuals lies about.
You want to claim for some reason that there's no way to know any of that. Not that you have any evidence.
So we just disagree.
I'm going to leave it at that. We'll have to agree to disagree.
Fair enough?
.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/19/2018 02:41PM by zn.
