In hindsight, not resigning JJ was a terrible move. Rodney, as well. However, in the current Peters situation--what is the risk? Given the recent news the compensation to acquire Peters is mid and low draft picks. If he does not work out, that is small bet or asset lost.
The choose incorrectly in keeping Trumaine and not Janoris. However, this move seems a low risk, high reward move. Peters is a definite large risk but we are supposedly getting him on the cheap. Though we are depending on him to play. That dependence is the greater risk to me.
Organizations not sure on signing a player long term are best served not signing them long term imo.
LA what would you have preferred to see them do with the moves you mentioned? The JJ situation was handled in an embarrassing fashion for me.
