Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: This is what I don't get

November 30, 2017 01:45PM
Wow...it's been a long time since I posted here.

Saw the post got put on Twitter and wanted to clarify a few things.

Btw, hope all are well, had a wonderful Thanksgiving and that your holidays go very well.

Okay, so I'll just enumerate to make this easier. I'm using my pattern recognition to realize what may happen and if so, how to turn lemons into lemonade.

1) I don't want to trade AD. This is a "what if" scenario which I'll get to next. And it may come to that. It's not ME that wants this, but it may be inevitable.

2) I don't think the money is the issue. Heck, AD could take a $30+M cap hit next year and a pretty big one the year after on a very front-loaded contract which players tend to love. So, what's the holdup? Well, my somewhat educated guess is that AD and his agent want a 3-year player opt-out. And I TOTALLY support the Rams in saying that's Chernobyl level toxic. It's just a dead, hard no.

Why? Well, it means for all intents and purposes, the Rams would have to amortize ALL of the guaranteed money in the first 3 years of the contract or they risk having tons of dead money on the cap. Secondly, if AD keeps playing as he has (and why wouldn't he?), then we're always going to be at the most expensive part of the contract. And again, hard no, AD is NOT worth $30+M per year.

3) Unless teams can quantify the streaming numbers and show an increase in viewership, the NEXT TV package will be smaller. The networks won't be able to go to shareholders and justify further increases when viewership is down between 10-15% in only a few years and the NFL has done a really crappy job addressing CTE, player discipline and player's substance abuse issues (the lack of differentiation between pot/alcohol and PEDs like steroids, HGH, and Adderall strike fans and non-fans alike badly). Thus, if the cap begins to shrink, having AD being at the next opt-out wanting the next biggest contract will mean the Rams will still have paid to rent him. If that's the case, then just make him play on the 5th year option and have him play 2-3 years on the tag and it STILL will be less than giving him the 3 year opt out.

And we still like lose him after he opts out because Goff, Gurley and other contracts will rightly need to be addressed.

The rest of the post was more about IF the Rams decide to move on, how could it turn out to be a net positive or net neutral transaction.

I think Da'Ron Payne could be an amazing player. Not AD good, but really dang good. Why would INDY do it? Well, they're D needs a shot and they have tons of cap AND already have Luck on a Franchise contract, so they know they really have the space.

I'll conclude with this: I want AD to retire as a Ram and the GOAT defensive player. Unfortunately, if he and is agents are asking for the 3 year opt-out like I think, that's just not going to happen.

If that's the case, then the question isn't IF AD leaves, but how.

I was only addressing one possible "how".

Again, hope all are well and enjoying this new Rams regime and this new Rams day.

GO RAMS!!!
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  An outside the box AD post by Mackeyser...

Rams431190November 24, 2017 01:50PM

  And the Colts don't see Payne sitting there for them?

NewMexicoRam346November 24, 2017 02:43PM

  no

wv ram363November 24, 2017 06:03PM

  Alyo AND OTHERS! THOUGHTS?!

k3340November 24, 2017 06:31PM

  No.

GreatRamNTheSky363November 24, 2017 07:20PM

  Re: No.

Rams43542November 24, 2017 08:59PM

  Donald isn't a great fit for a 3-4

Speedball89517November 24, 2017 10:08PM

  Re: Donald isn't a great fit for a 3-4

GreatRamNTheSky323November 25, 2017 04:12AM

  Re: Donald isn't a great fit for a 3-4

zn351November 25, 2017 04:32AM

  Re: Donald isn't a great fit for a 3-4

Speedball89454November 25, 2017 09:22AM

  Re: Donald isn't a great fit for a 3-4

Shaky344November 25, 2017 12:08PM

  Re: Donald isn't a great fit for a 3-4

Speedball89390November 25, 2017 01:12PM

  Not a great fit?

jemach201December 03, 2017 09:53AM

  plus

zn426November 24, 2017 09:39PM

  Re: plus

reggae291November 25, 2017 02:13PM

  Better chance to trade Goff to the Colts

RFIP429November 25, 2017 04:11AM

  Man, you don't like Goff do you?

GreatRamNTheSky404November 25, 2017 04:13AM

  Re: Man, you don't like Goff do you?

RFIP352November 25, 2017 04:34AM

  I don't think anyone is trading AD etiher

GreatRamNTheSky310November 25, 2017 05:18AM

  Trades

RFIP310November 25, 2017 05:56AM

  Re: Man, you don't like Goff do you?

RamsFanSinceLA275December 01, 2017 12:43AM

  That makes no sense

Speedball89280November 25, 2017 09:27AM

  Re: That makes no sense

RFIP342November 25, 2017 02:08PM

  It was the coach obviously

Speedball89393November 25, 2017 02:28PM

  after Shotty?

Blue and Gold290November 25, 2017 02:34PM

  Re: after Shotty?

Speedball89278November 25, 2017 03:12PM

  either of these trades is moronic

reggae298November 25, 2017 02:09PM

  Re: RFIP, that hypothetical trade stinks!

XXXIVwin437November 25, 2017 02:57PM

  This is what I don't get

AlbaNY_Ram333November 25, 2017 04:46AM

  Easy. Because he'll be a Ram for the next 3 years regardless.

RockRam325November 25, 2017 05:04AM

  that would not be a fair contract

zn372November 25, 2017 05:08AM

  Re: that would not be a fair contract

Rams43351November 25, 2017 08:15AM

  Remember Eric Dickerson nm

reggae300November 25, 2017 02:49PM

  Re: This is what I don't get

Mackeyser471November 30, 2017 01:45PM

  Re: This is what I don't get

dzrams237November 30, 2017 10:32PM

  Re: This is what I don't get

Mackeyser395December 03, 2017 09:47AM

  Re: An outside the box AD post by Mackeyser...

reggae254November 25, 2017 11:39AM

  I would trade Julio Jones

reggae472November 25, 2017 02:54PM

  Re: I would trade Julio Jones

Mackeyser352November 30, 2017 01:53PM

  Rams will be Super Bowl contender next year...

jemach210December 03, 2017 09:51AM

  Re: Rams will be Super Bowl contender next year...

Mackeyser359December 03, 2017 10:03AM