Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

+1... agree 100%

July 12, 2017 09:47AM
Totally.... I thought at the time they kept the right guy too. Still not sure they didn't. We need to see how Jenkins and Johnson play in 2017. To me Johnson was clear-cut better in 2015 and the much more consistent of the two during their 4 seasons together. I'm still glad the Rams didn't pay what the NYG did. Donald is the priority to keep and they can probably re-sign Ogletree and either Joyner or Alexander for what Jenkins received.

Paying Johnson $31M over two years and then (presumably) getting a high comp. pick for him in 2019 vs. paying Jenkins $36M for three years- with another $4M still guaranteed him after that- is fine with me. Maybe over 2017 and 2018 I'll be proved wrong.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Incidentally, Just How Did The Rams Bungle Keeping Janoris Jenkins?

Classicalwit1066July 11, 2017 10:30PM

  mostly on Demoff

max397July 12, 2017 02:37AM

  Incidentally, Why Do You You Consider Letting JJ Walk a Bungle?

PHDram383July 12, 2017 04:36AM

  Re: Incidentally, Why Do You You Consider Letting JJ Walk a Bungle?

RFIP485July 12, 2017 05:00AM

  two $10+ mil cbs

PHDram307July 12, 2017 05:53AM

  another way to look at it

zn308July 12, 2017 05:13AM

  few would have rated jj a top 10 cb

PHDram294July 12, 2017 05:34AM

  Re: few would have rated jj a top 10 cb

zn278July 12, 2017 05:53AM

  Jenkins was a piece of burnt toast over the years

GreatRamNTheSky402July 12, 2017 06:01AM

  Re: Jenkins was a piece of burnt toast over the years

Rams43273July 12, 2017 06:27AM

  Re: Yeah just not paying attention..

laram273July 12, 2017 06:36AM

  Re: Yeah just not paying attention..

GreatRamNTheSky302July 12, 2017 10:59AM

  Re: Yeah just not paying attention..

Classicalwit317July 12, 2017 06:07PM

  Re: Jenkins was a piece of burnt toast over the years

GreatRamNTheSky525July 12, 2017 10:59AM

  I'm going with Occam's Razor on this one...

Rams43317July 12, 2017 06:20AM

  youre assuming that jj would have signed with the rams

PHDram279July 12, 2017 06:59AM

  that's a fair assumption though IMO

zn360July 12, 2017 07:07AM

  Re: youre assuming that jj would have signed with the rams

dzrams264July 12, 2017 07:44AM

  Re: youre assuming that jj would have signed with the rams

PHDram273July 12, 2017 07:56AM

  Re: youre assuming that jj would have signed with the rams

dzrams304July 12, 2017 09:12AM

  Re: youre assuming that jj would have signed with the rams

PHDram215July 12, 2017 09:26AM

  Re: youre assuming that jj would have signed with the rams

dzrams285July 12, 2017 09:39AM

  Third highest guarantee money.

Rampage2K-249July 12, 2017 09:50AM

  Re: Third highest guarantee money.

dzrams290July 12, 2017 09:57AM

  Re: Third highest guarantee money.

PHDram248July 12, 2017 10:14AM

  same thing either way

zn259July 12, 2017 12:35PM

  The way I see it...

max249July 12, 2017 12:42PM

  Re: youre assuming that jj would have signed with the rams

zn246July 12, 2017 08:15AM

  Thats mostly fair...

max279July 12, 2017 06:59AM

  People have short memories.... This is simple.

Rampage2K-305July 12, 2017 08:54AM

  Re: People have short memories.... This is simple.

dzrams406July 12, 2017 09:15AM

  Re: People have short memories.... This is simple.

Rampage2K-251July 12, 2017 09:26AM

  Re: People have short memories.... This is simple.

dzrams294July 12, 2017 09:40AM

  +1... agree 100%

LMU93297July 12, 2017 09:47AM

  Re: The Rams don't even know if Tru fits their new scheme...

laram269July 12, 2017 10:13AM

  They are talking about Wade's defense

GreatRamNTheSky285July 12, 2017 11:02AM

  Re: Thus the phrase "new scheme" lol...NM

laram239July 12, 2017 11:07AM

  Re: People have short memories.... This is simple.

Classicalwit292July 12, 2017 05:52PM