December 25, 2016 08:18AM
Quote
RamUK
Quote
zn
Quote
Billy_T
I know, I know . . . He's a rookie, and he has a Swiss Cheese line, no receivers,...c. But, if I'm just zooming in on Goff, and no one else, I'm just not seeing him play within any pattern that matches up with all of that, with his context.

Well as a rule, how many rookie qbs have you ever seen playing under those conditiosn who DID play well.

You want to know what a talented rookie qb looks like when there is no running game, the OL is playing poorly, and the receivers are mediocre?

Like Goff has.

Yet...somehow, you think that says something about Goff?

So again---how many rookie qbs have you seen with no running game, leaky protection, and mediocre receivers who DID look good according to your criteria?

In contrast to you, in the midst of the chaos, I CAN see the unique talents Goff brings to the game. It's there, in the middle of all the mayhem. It CAN be seen.

...

I get what you're saying and to a large extent agree, but to suggest that how Goff is playing has nothing to do with how good Goff is, is a tad out there.

Hope all is well, RamUK.

Yeah, Goff isn't innocent in all of this. He's the starting QB, rookie or not. The quality of his play is also on him, even with all of those lousy factors surrounding him. It's both/and, not either/or.

Kinda like the Gurley situation, in a way . . . and I was a huge fan of that draft pick. Gurley simply hasn't run well this season, even if we factor in the lousy line play, coaching, etc. etc. He rarely has shown anything close to his burst, power or drive from last year, and that can't all be on the line, etc. etc.

I guess it's a bit of the chicken and egg kinda thing. Since it's all intertwined, interconnected and interstellar -- um, whoops. That's another topic altogether. Goff and Gurley are still a part of the quality of play for the Rams. They count. Their actions count, within the larger context, blah blah blah.

I'm just saying, I don't think Goff has shown he's able to rise above the rotten, no goodnic situation he's in as often as he should -- as the first player chosen. And since he's done it on occasion, we know he can. We know he's capable of it. So why doesn't he do it on a more consistent basis?

Not saying he should be able to do all the time, or even lot. But he should be able to make it happen more than occasionally. Again, if he can do it at all, that means he can increase quality plays. And that's largely on him, in my view.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Can't figure Goff out. Not seeing a pattern yet.

Billy_T815December 25, 2016 04:43AM

  That is because his coaching here with Rams has sucked.

GreatRamNTheSky305December 25, 2016 04:54AM

  Re: That is because his coaching here with Rams has sucked.

Billy_T538December 25, 2016 04:59AM

  Re: That is because his coaching here with Rams has sucked.

GreatRamNTheSky365December 25, 2016 05:02AM

  Re: That is because his coaching here with Rams has sucked.

73Ram331December 25, 2016 05:23AM

  Re: That is because his coaching here with Rams has sucked.

poplarbluffman182December 26, 2016 02:19AM

  zero

wv ram430December 25, 2016 05:26AM

  Re: zero

Billy_T392December 25, 2016 07:55AM

  Re: Can't figure Goff out. Not seeing a pattern yet.

zn530December 25, 2016 06:04AM

  How can it NOT say something about Goff?

RamUK344December 25, 2016 08:01AM

  What are you really looking for

BumRap241December 25, 2016 08:16AM

  Re: How can it NOT say something about Goff?

Billy_T489December 25, 2016 08:18AM

  Re: Unrealistic

BumRap307December 25, 2016 08:42AM

  Re: How can it NOT say something about Goff?

zn356December 25, 2016 09:22AM

  Re: How can it NOT say something about Goff?

moklerman280December 26, 2016 01:05AM

  Re: Can't figure Goff out. Not seeing a pattern yet.

Billy_T396December 25, 2016 08:08AM

  Re: Can't figure Goff out. Not seeing a pattern yet.

zn187December 26, 2016 03:35AM

  Re: To be a bit more specific . . . .

Billy_T189December 26, 2016 04:19AM

  Re: To be a bit more specific . . . .

zn308December 26, 2016 04:39AM

  Re: To be a bit more specific . . . .

Billy_T189December 26, 2016 04:49AM

  Re: To be a bit more specific . . . .

zn196December 26, 2016 05:23AM

  Re: To be a bit more specific . . . .

Billy_T190December 26, 2016 05:54AM

  Re: To be a bit more specific . . . .

zn380December 26, 2016 06:12AM

  Do I get a gold star

RamUK371December 25, 2016 07:59AM

  Re: Yep. Well done.

Billy_T359December 25, 2016 08:23AM

  Re: Can't figure Goff out. Not seeing a pattern yet.

Rams43218December 25, 2016 08:32AM

  you're seeing EXACTLY the pattern

zn342December 25, 2016 06:03PM

  Not seeing a pattern yet? I don't see our WRs running any!!

SunTzu_vs_Camus191December 26, 2016 04:22AM

  Re: Not seeing a pattern yet? I don't see our WRs running any!!

Billy_T294December 26, 2016 04:38AM

  Re: Good post

Speed_Kills193December 26, 2016 05:33AM

  Re: Enzyme deficiency? I missed that, SK.

Billy_T198December 26, 2016 06:05AM

  it's NOT a continuing issue

zn262December 26, 2016 06:15AM

  as in

zn206December 26, 2016 06:23AM