Quote
Rams_81
So with that criteria, if Keenum develops and actually improves his game, he no longer qualifies that he was ever a backup.

That basically rigs the evaluation. If you end up being good, you can't be considered a backup.

I don't think that will happen with Keenum with this particular offensive coaching staff, but he could improve and than by this criteria, he wouldn't qualify as judging backup QBs, once that happens.

He's too limited to be a starter. It has been 5 years. The evidence is in on that.

A simple test is this. Ask yourself if anyone after the season will give him starter's money.

And besides, let's say your scenario DID turn out the way you describe. Why would that be "unfair"? To whom or to what?

You're actually saying that because of minor debate on the internet, you would resent a scenario where a Rams qb improved a significant amount? What kind of logic is that? As improbable as that is, if that did happen, you ought to be glad about it.

..