Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Rams QB ratings since "the dark times"...

Previous Message Next Message
Forum List Message List New Topic Print View
LMU93
September 27, 2016 03:40AM
Rams QB ratings (cumulative) since beginning of 2007 (minimum 90 attempts):

1. Austin Davis- 85.1
2. Shaun Hill- 83.9
3. Sam Bradford- 79.3
4. Case Keenum- 78.6
5. Kellen Clemens- 76.2
6. Marc Bulger- 70.9
7. Nick Foles- 69.0
8. AJ Feeley- 66.0
9. Kyle Boller- 61.2
10. Gus Frerotte- 58.3
11. Keith Null- 49.9
Reply Quote
RSS
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

ferragamo79922September 26, 2016 06:38PM

  Re: Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

Speed_Kills548September 26, 2016 06:42PM

  You stole my thunder

RFIP442September 27, 2016 02:43AM

  different opinion

zn603September 26, 2016 06:59PM

  Re: different opinion

stlramz374September 26, 2016 08:12PM

  Re: different opinion

zn500September 26, 2016 08:32PM

  Rams QB ratings since "the dark times"...

LMU93419September 27, 2016 03:40AM

  a note on Rams QBs under Fisher

LMU93324September 27, 2016 03:53AM

  Re: a note on Rams QBs under Fisher

zn398September 27, 2016 04:11AM

  I think the # of passes is a chicken/egg thing.

Saguaro373September 27, 2016 06:59AM

  Which brings up an important question

stlramz416September 27, 2016 07:05PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

TonyHunter87399September 27, 2016 01:44PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

zn421September 27, 2016 09:03PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

TonyHunter87351September 27, 2016 10:52PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

zn376September 27, 2016 11:06PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

JamesJM390September 27, 2016 11:21PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

zn289September 27, 2016 11:30PM

  Re: Ok funny story about Warner

Speed_Kills253September 28, 2016 01:46PM

  Re: Ok funny story about Warner

zn250September 28, 2016 02:17PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

TonyHunter87579September 28, 2016 03:53PM

  Re: different opinion

jim beam573September 27, 2016 02:08PM

  Re: different opinion

zn373September 27, 2016 03:14PM

  Re: different opinion

kw13630September 27, 2016 04:03PM

  different guys

zn403September 27, 2016 04:44PM

  Please tell me

RFIP407September 27, 2016 04:42PM

  Re: Please tell me

zn374September 27, 2016 05:44PM

  Bulger was 6-1 in 2002 I believe

Rams_81310September 27, 2016 05:51PM

  Re: Bulger was 6-1 in 2002 I believe

zn505September 27, 2016 06:16PM

  Re: Bulger was 6-1 in 2002 I believe

TonyHunter87369September 27, 2016 10:56PM

  Re: Bulger was 6-1 in 2002 I believe

zn385September 27, 2016 11:37PM

  That is unfair

Rams_81256September 28, 2016 03:02AM

  I would never say that

zn407September 28, 2016 06:38AM

  No that is not what I am saying

Rams_81271September 28, 2016 10:12AM

  Re: No that is not what I am saying

TonyHunter87235September 28, 2016 11:43AM

  nope

zn246September 28, 2016 12:13PM

  I did love this

Rams_81260September 28, 2016 12:16PM

  Re: Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

dodgerram421September 26, 2016 10:47PM

  Re: Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

David Deacon421September 27, 2016 02:59AM

  Yup that's right

LesBaker457September 27, 2016 02:19PM

  I honestly don't know...

JamesJM243September 28, 2016 10:28AM

  Re: Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

brownsugar390September 27, 2016 10:32AM
Previous Message Next Message
Forum List Message List New Topic Print View



RamsFootballFans.comBucky's PubThe RamsFootballFans.com Tailgate PartyGame Time ForumHelp and Support ForumJack Youngblood ChatJim Everett ChatKevin Demoff ChatDeacon Jones Chat Thursday April 5th at 9pm est.Mike Karney Q&AAnnouncements Recent Messages