Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Bulger was 6-1 in 2002 I believe

September 27, 2016 11:37PM
Quote
TonyHunter87
Lol Bulger was not being groomed to start. Joe Germaine was ahead of him on the depth chart. So he was a backup caliber qb. He came out of no where.


As I said before...no one really knew for sure about Bulger one way or another as a pro qb. And in fact yes, Martz and Ramsdell liked him before they got him. They had ranked him highly in the 2000 draft but just didn't take a qb that year. When he arrived, he was just inexperienced. But, it was not really possible to say what he was going to be in the pros.

That's not the same thing as knowing clearly that a guy is a #2 caliber qb, Which is what I am talking about. That's why I am careful not to say "#2 qb." I say "#2 CALIBER qb." Which means, you have to know what he is.

And btw Germaine was gone shortly after they picked up Bulger in 2000 and put him on the practice squad. In 2001, it was Bulger behind Jamie Martin.
...

...



Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 09/27/2016 11:46PM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

ferragamo79922September 26, 2016 06:38PM

  Re: Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

Speed_Kills549September 26, 2016 06:42PM

  You stole my thunder

RFIP442September 27, 2016 02:43AM

  different opinion

zn603September 26, 2016 06:59PM

  Re: different opinion

stlramz375September 26, 2016 08:12PM

  Re: different opinion

zn500September 26, 2016 08:32PM

  Rams QB ratings since "the dark times"...

LMU93420September 27, 2016 03:40AM

  a note on Rams QBs under Fisher

LMU93324September 27, 2016 03:53AM

  Re: a note on Rams QBs under Fisher

zn399September 27, 2016 04:11AM

  I think the # of passes is a chicken/egg thing.

Saguaro373September 27, 2016 06:59AM

  Which brings up an important question

stlramz417September 27, 2016 07:05PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

TonyHunter87399September 27, 2016 01:44PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

zn422September 27, 2016 09:03PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

TonyHunter87352September 27, 2016 10:52PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

zn377September 27, 2016 11:06PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

JamesJM390September 27, 2016 11:21PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

zn290September 27, 2016 11:30PM

  Re: Ok funny story about Warner

Speed_Kills254September 28, 2016 01:46PM

  Re: Ok funny story about Warner

zn250September 28, 2016 02:17PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

TonyHunter87580September 28, 2016 03:53PM

  Re: different opinion

jim beam573September 27, 2016 02:08PM

  Re: different opinion

zn374September 27, 2016 03:14PM

  Re: different opinion

kw13630September 27, 2016 04:03PM

  different guys

zn403September 27, 2016 04:44PM

  Please tell me

RFIP408September 27, 2016 04:42PM

  Re: Please tell me

zn375September 27, 2016 05:44PM

  Bulger was 6-1 in 2002 I believe

Rams_81311September 27, 2016 05:51PM

  Re: Bulger was 6-1 in 2002 I believe

zn506September 27, 2016 06:16PM

  Re: Bulger was 6-1 in 2002 I believe

TonyHunter87370September 27, 2016 10:56PM

  Re: Bulger was 6-1 in 2002 I believe

zn385September 27, 2016 11:37PM

  That is unfair

Rams_81257September 28, 2016 03:02AM

  I would never say that

zn407September 28, 2016 06:38AM

  No that is not what I am saying

Rams_81271September 28, 2016 10:12AM

  Re: No that is not what I am saying

TonyHunter87236September 28, 2016 11:43AM

  nope

zn247September 28, 2016 12:13PM

  I did love this

Rams_81260September 28, 2016 12:16PM

  Re: Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

dodgerram422September 26, 2016 10:47PM

  Re: Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

David Deacon421September 27, 2016 02:59AM

  Yup that's right

LesBaker459September 27, 2016 02:19PM

  I honestly don't know...

JamesJM244September 28, 2016 10:28AM

  Re: Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

brownsugar391September 27, 2016 10:32AM