Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

September 27, 2016 11:06PM
Quote
TonyHunter87
Well u get my meaning. No one excepted Bulger to be a starter. But i get that u like Keenum. I don't which u know. As much as i hate to say it, I'd he continues to start the rams season will go down the drain like the last 12 years. I've seen it many times.

No one expected Warner to be a starter either.

For that matter, same with Trent Green when he started out.

No...you can;t just turn these distinctions into a joke. cool smiley And being ignorant of what a player can do because he hasn't played yet is not the same as definitively knowing he is a #2 caliber qb.

That's why, notice, not many say anything when it comes to this about Mannion. Is he a starting caliber qb? Or is he a #2 caliber qb? So he is in the category of "don't really know yet."

We can answer that with Keenum because this is his 5th year in the league and he has started 18 games. Before this year, 15. Before last year, 10. You can judge from that.

In terms of Keenum, he's a placeholder and back-up who is starting...but he's a pretty good one of those. He's not going to start 12 more games and I doubt anyone anywhere thinks he will. But the fact is, in the last 3 years combined, when he has started, his team has gone 7-3. I am not sure why that's to be scoffed at.

It;'s easy to point out his limitations but not so easy to point out why he is doing well overall in spite of them. I don't see where many people seem to get what his strengths and virtues are.

BUT he cannot carry the team, he probably can't get them to come back from deep behind. He just has to play mid-80s level in terms of qb rating and that's enough to contribute to wins.

He does enough to be the best #2 the Rams have had in over a decade. And it's not because of stuff that you analyze at the combine...measurables stuff.


...

....



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 09/27/2016 11:09PM by zn.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

ferragamo79922September 26, 2016 06:38PM

  Re: Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

Speed_Kills549September 26, 2016 06:42PM

  You stole my thunder

RFIP442September 27, 2016 02:43AM

  different opinion

zn603September 26, 2016 06:59PM

  Re: different opinion

stlramz374September 26, 2016 08:12PM

  Re: different opinion

zn500September 26, 2016 08:32PM

  Rams QB ratings since "the dark times"...

LMU93420September 27, 2016 03:40AM

  a note on Rams QBs under Fisher

LMU93324September 27, 2016 03:53AM

  Re: a note on Rams QBs under Fisher

zn399September 27, 2016 04:11AM

  I think the # of passes is a chicken/egg thing.

Saguaro373September 27, 2016 06:59AM

  Which brings up an important question

stlramz416September 27, 2016 07:05PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

TonyHunter87399September 27, 2016 01:44PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

zn422September 27, 2016 09:03PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

TonyHunter87351September 27, 2016 10:52PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

zn376September 27, 2016 11:06PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

JamesJM390September 27, 2016 11:21PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

zn289September 27, 2016 11:30PM

  Re: Ok funny story about Warner

Speed_Kills254September 28, 2016 01:46PM

  Re: Ok funny story about Warner

zn250September 28, 2016 02:17PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

TonyHunter87579September 28, 2016 03:53PM

  Re: different opinion

jim beam573September 27, 2016 02:08PM

  Re: different opinion

zn374September 27, 2016 03:14PM

  Re: different opinion

kw13630September 27, 2016 04:03PM

  different guys

zn403September 27, 2016 04:44PM

  Please tell me

RFIP408September 27, 2016 04:42PM

  Re: Please tell me

zn375September 27, 2016 05:44PM

  Bulger was 6-1 in 2002 I believe

Rams_81310September 27, 2016 05:51PM

  Re: Bulger was 6-1 in 2002 I believe

zn505September 27, 2016 06:16PM

  Re: Bulger was 6-1 in 2002 I believe

TonyHunter87370September 27, 2016 10:56PM

  Re: Bulger was 6-1 in 2002 I believe

zn385September 27, 2016 11:37PM

  That is unfair

Rams_81257September 28, 2016 03:02AM

  I would never say that

zn407September 28, 2016 06:38AM

  No that is not what I am saying

Rams_81271September 28, 2016 10:12AM

  Re: No that is not what I am saying

TonyHunter87236September 28, 2016 11:43AM

  nope

zn246September 28, 2016 12:13PM

  I did love this

Rams_81260September 28, 2016 12:16PM

  Re: Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

dodgerram422September 26, 2016 10:47PM

  Re: Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

David Deacon421September 27, 2016 02:59AM

  Yup that's right

LesBaker459September 27, 2016 02:19PM

  I honestly don't know...

JamesJM244September 28, 2016 10:28AM

  Re: Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

brownsugar391September 27, 2016 10:32AM