Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: a note on Rams QBs under Fisher

September 27, 2016 04:11AM
Quote
LMU93
I would imagine the league overall isn't that much different, but an interesting Rams' stat (to me):

Under Fisher, when Rams' QBs have a QB rating above 80.0 and throw fewer than 40 passes in a game the Rams are 24-7-1. In all other games they are 5-30.

Throw the ball reasonably effectively- and not too much- and you win....

Another interesting thing.

W/Ls when they have these 3 things.

a relatively healthy OL

a running threat

a starting qb who has not melted down (or, lacking that, Keenum)

(Or a qb who can still play effectively behind a messed up OL, but those are not very common.)

Total games that fit that?

Well it depends on whether you count Foles's 1st 4 games, while he was still okay.

I will. So. The total games that fit that = 23. Out of 67.

Their record in those 22 games? 13-9-1

That's:
Nameless One = 6-4-1
Foles = 2-2
Keenum = 4-3

In the other 44 games? Where 1 or 2 of those ingredients is missing? 16-28.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

ferragamo79922September 26, 2016 06:38PM

  Re: Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

Speed_Kills549September 26, 2016 06:42PM

  You stole my thunder

RFIP442September 27, 2016 02:43AM

  different opinion

zn603September 26, 2016 06:59PM

  Re: different opinion

stlramz374September 26, 2016 08:12PM

  Re: different opinion

zn500September 26, 2016 08:32PM

  Rams QB ratings since "the dark times"...

LMU93420September 27, 2016 03:40AM

  a note on Rams QBs under Fisher

LMU93324September 27, 2016 03:53AM

  Re: a note on Rams QBs under Fisher

zn398September 27, 2016 04:11AM

  I think the # of passes is a chicken/egg thing.

Saguaro373September 27, 2016 06:59AM

  Which brings up an important question

stlramz416September 27, 2016 07:05PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

TonyHunter87399September 27, 2016 01:44PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

zn422September 27, 2016 09:03PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

TonyHunter87351September 27, 2016 10:52PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

zn376September 27, 2016 11:06PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

JamesJM390September 27, 2016 11:21PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

zn289September 27, 2016 11:30PM

  Re: Ok funny story about Warner

Speed_Kills253September 28, 2016 01:46PM

  Re: Ok funny story about Warner

zn250September 28, 2016 02:17PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

TonyHunter87579September 28, 2016 03:53PM

  Re: different opinion

jim beam573September 27, 2016 02:08PM

  Re: different opinion

zn373September 27, 2016 03:14PM

  Re: different opinion

kw13630September 27, 2016 04:03PM

  different guys

zn403September 27, 2016 04:44PM

  Please tell me

RFIP407September 27, 2016 04:42PM

  Re: Please tell me

zn375September 27, 2016 05:44PM

  Bulger was 6-1 in 2002 I believe

Rams_81310September 27, 2016 05:51PM

  Re: Bulger was 6-1 in 2002 I believe

zn505September 27, 2016 06:16PM

  Re: Bulger was 6-1 in 2002 I believe

TonyHunter87369September 27, 2016 10:56PM

  Re: Bulger was 6-1 in 2002 I believe

zn385September 27, 2016 11:37PM

  That is unfair

Rams_81257September 28, 2016 03:02AM

  I would never say that

zn407September 28, 2016 06:38AM

  No that is not what I am saying

Rams_81271September 28, 2016 10:12AM

  Re: No that is not what I am saying

TonyHunter87236September 28, 2016 11:43AM

  nope

zn246September 28, 2016 12:13PM

  I did love this

Rams_81260September 28, 2016 12:16PM

  Re: Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

dodgerram422September 26, 2016 10:47PM

  Re: Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

David Deacon421September 27, 2016 02:59AM

  Yup that's right

LesBaker458September 27, 2016 02:19PM

  I honestly don't know...

JamesJM244September 28, 2016 10:28AM

  Re: Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

brownsugar390September 27, 2016 10:32AM