September 27, 2016 06:16PM
Quote
Rams_81
and was 18-4 in his first 22 games.

We are of course discussing #2 caliber qbs. Not qbs who were #1 caliber starters who just spent time on the bench before starting.

That was directly specified.

Otherwise you end up saying that Warner, Green (in 2000), and Bulger were all #2 caliber qbs, which is of course nonsense.

Keenum is a #2 type. That's clear. So you want to compare him to other #2 types. Or you just end up with gibberish. Distinctions like that matter.

.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

ferragamo79925September 26, 2016 06:38PM

  Re: Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

Speed_Kills549September 26, 2016 06:42PM

  You stole my thunder

RFIP443September 27, 2016 02:43AM

  different opinion

zn604September 26, 2016 06:59PM

  Re: different opinion

stlramz376September 26, 2016 08:12PM

  Re: different opinion

zn501September 26, 2016 08:32PM

  Rams QB ratings since "the dark times"...

LMU93420September 27, 2016 03:40AM

  a note on Rams QBs under Fisher

LMU93325September 27, 2016 03:53AM

  Re: a note on Rams QBs under Fisher

zn399September 27, 2016 04:11AM

  I think the # of passes is a chicken/egg thing.

Saguaro374September 27, 2016 06:59AM

  Which brings up an important question

stlramz417September 27, 2016 07:05PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

TonyHunter87400September 27, 2016 01:44PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

zn422September 27, 2016 09:03PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

TonyHunter87352September 27, 2016 10:52PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

zn378September 27, 2016 11:06PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

JamesJM391September 27, 2016 11:21PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

zn291September 27, 2016 11:30PM

  Re: Ok funny story about Warner

Speed_Kills254September 28, 2016 01:46PM

  Re: Ok funny story about Warner

zn251September 28, 2016 02:17PM

  Re: Austin Davis was better than Keenum

TonyHunter87580September 28, 2016 03:53PM

  Re: different opinion

jim beam574September 27, 2016 02:08PM

  Re: different opinion

zn374September 27, 2016 03:14PM

  Re: different opinion

kw13631September 27, 2016 04:03PM

  different guys

zn405September 27, 2016 04:44PM

  Please tell me

RFIP408September 27, 2016 04:42PM

  Re: Please tell me

zn375September 27, 2016 05:44PM

  Bulger was 6-1 in 2002 I believe

Rams_81311September 27, 2016 05:51PM

  Re: Bulger was 6-1 in 2002 I believe

zn506September 27, 2016 06:16PM

  Re: Bulger was 6-1 in 2002 I believe

TonyHunter87371September 27, 2016 10:56PM

  Re: Bulger was 6-1 in 2002 I believe

zn387September 27, 2016 11:37PM

  That is unfair

Rams_81258September 28, 2016 03:02AM

  I would never say that

zn409September 28, 2016 06:38AM

  No that is not what I am saying

Rams_81273September 28, 2016 10:12AM

  Re: No that is not what I am saying

TonyHunter87237September 28, 2016 11:43AM

  nope

zn247September 28, 2016 12:13PM

  I did love this

Rams_81263September 28, 2016 12:16PM

  Re: Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

dodgerram422September 26, 2016 10:47PM

  Re: Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

David Deacon421September 27, 2016 02:59AM

  Yup that's right

LesBaker459September 27, 2016 02:19PM

  I honestly don't know...

JamesJM244September 28, 2016 10:28AM

  Re: Keenum is no better than Hill, Clemens or Feeley

brownsugar391September 27, 2016 10:32AM