perhaps youre right...
but last year he moved the the team and they looked better offensively then under foles. and this preseason the team has continued to look good under him. i know its preseason so who cares but hes qb rating is 111.
i know goff will eventually take over but id rather see ck until he is "ready"....
warner may be a once in a lifetime story but your response doesnt really answer the question. again no one is saying ck is warner. im saying ck is average. are you saying there are no other examples of a player getting cut and going on to become average?
Quote
dodgerram
Quote
PHDram
at least im not.
what i am saying is that he is an average qb who can win some games with a good team around him while goff continues to get acclimated to the nfl.
and just out of curiosity if warner was "that" good why did the packers let him go? my guess is that he wasnt "that" good at "that" time. in other words, he improved with time and experience. and no...im not saying CK is warner. im simply illustrating how 22 year old kids can improve over time given the opportunity to develop.
Well, Kubiak decided he is not good enough to start or at least backup.
That Kind of "that good".
IMHO CK is not even an average QB in the NFL. A fringe Player and it is proven by his history in this league.
Sometimes Players are what they look like on the field.
Warner is a once in a lifetime Story. And he was supported by some of the greatest playmakers to ever Dress in the NFL with a superb o-line to boot.
Go Rams!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
