We can agree to disagree. Who's to say CK wins those 3 games. That's not a given. Nor is it a given that he would have won the games that Nick won (the first Seattle and AZ come to mind).
Are you really comparing Kurt to Case? That should spark fun responses. When Kurt came on the scene he had no extended regular season experience whatsoever. Right from the get go Kurt was incredible and proved he could not only play but excel at this level. It's just my opinion, but I don't think anyone will be comparing Kurt to Case very soon.
Hey, be happy. Case is your starter. Enjoy him while you can because he will be replaced. Hopefully sooner than later.
If Case goes on to win 10-11 games and we go to the playoffs I'll be the first one to eat crow and like it.
Quote
GreatRamNTheSky
We all saw how much better the Rams offense as with Keenum. I have heard even ex-pros talk about the difference Keenum made in that offense.
When you consider the Rams lost 3 games by less then 14 points and you add those three losses to the win column that is 10 wins.
So, how is that hypothetical nonsense?
Keep in mind that Kurt Warner would have never happened period if it was not for Trent Green getting hurt and today you would be telling me that Kurt Warner was just a wannabe QB like many wannabe QBs in the NFL over the years. Isn't that right?
Keenum has demonstrated in games last year and this summer that he is very comfortable running the offense. You give Keenum a Todd Gurley and he's blessed. Keenum is the exact age Warner was when Warner got his big break. Until then Kurt was just another guy on an NFL roster.
Keenum not only played in 4 games but he played very well. I don't care what ESPN says.
Grits