Quote
Leoram
When Wolford ran for first downs and completed some downfield throws, those that have longed for Goff's departure saw what they wanted.
It's what I've said all along. If you're looking for greatness you will find it while excusing the flaws. If you're looking for flaws, you will ignore the positive because it doesn't fit your criteria.
An objective evaluation would compare both QB's vs THE SAME OPPONENT. In that regard, the stats say the competition isn't remotely close.
Agenda is your answer.
Thank you everyone for demonstrating my point. It's almost like this is a board filled with attorneys who are legally committed to only one side of the debate. Dig in and justify your position.
This is a team game and at times, when the offense operates well (runs the ball, no penalties, fumbles, drops, interceptions, missed blocks) the QB gets as much credit as the viewer wants to give him. When those bad things occur and the offense flails, the QB gets as much blame as the viewer wants to assign.
It's funny how in one context a QB can do a dozen really good things and his big error is excused but another QB can do a dozen really good things and his big error is vilified. It's as though the performances of the defense, ST, and other team has nothing to do with a win or loss. Once an agenda is set, all narrative will follow that agenda and several here REFUSE to acknowledge the other side because that would somehow "weaken" their argument. I hate that the dynamics of divorces and politics creep into the Rams boards I love so much.
