January 03, 2021 08:27PM
Quote
waterfield
If Goff is OK against Seattle he will start. I trust McVay and the coaches in any event. But Wolford played good and unless your a Goff hater you could see how teams will defend him. Moreover, to argue Wolford should start notwithstanding Goff is healthy would be to discard all the excellent games Goff has played and focus on a few bad ones is clearly agenda driven and makes no sense since your only looking at one game Wolford has played. I did like the accuracy on several of his throws and not so much on several others. His command on the LOS was also a concern but that should improve with more playing time with the starters. But he was the cause of several O line penalties today. He did look better than I thought he would given his total lack of NFL experience. He proved to me he can be an effective back up qb and if Goff is injured in Seattle or even if the coaches decide to put in Wolford I have no problem with that. I am sure many other teams took notice and I'm betting his wallet will be a lot thicker next season. Good for him.

One last thingy. If Mcvay and the offensive brain trust choose Wolford over a healthy Goff to start against Seattle and they lose both McVay and Snead will be fired by Kroenke after that extension given to Goff and the Gurley mistake.

Fired? You know what Stan is saying if anything? I hired you at 30 as our HC when no one else would even think about doing so. You go with who you think gives us the best chance to win period. It’s why I hired you. Stan actually understands what 4 straight winning season means to his franchise.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Wolford's stock rose today

waterfield1173January 03, 2021 04:42PM

  Hmm, disagree with a lot of that...

JamesJM417January 03, 2021 04:58PM

  yup me too

Speed_Kills269January 03, 2021 05:03PM

  O course you do.

waterfield261January 03, 2021 05:25PM

  I think you are on to something and its fair

BumRap195January 03, 2021 05:57PM

  Re: I think you are on to something and its fair

Ekern55174January 03, 2021 06:00PM

  And it will likely be wet and raining in Seattle...

NorCalRamFan243January 03, 2021 08:17PM

  thumb and throwing a wet ball are one thing......

21Dog193January 04, 2021 05:14AM

  Ok waterfield nm

Speed_Kills376January 03, 2021 06:05PM

  Re: Hmm, disagree with a lot of that...

waterfield218January 03, 2021 05:16PM

  But it's NOT, Waterfield... just 'recency bias'...

JamesJM206January 03, 2021 05:22PM

  Re: But it's NOT, Waterfield... just 'recency bias'...

waterfield428January 03, 2021 05:46PM

  Well, I absolutely do agree he's not Allen, or Wilson..

JamesJM307January 03, 2021 05:49PM

  Re: But it's NOT, Waterfield... just 'recency bias'...

waterfield139January 03, 2021 07:15PM

  Yeah, Kroenke will fire them. ROTFL

max203January 03, 2021 05:19PM

  Well, in fairness I think Waterfield used a little hyperbole there... (nm)

JamesJM168January 03, 2021 05:23PM

  Same Logic says Goff will start and not lose job

BumRap173January 03, 2021 05:31PM

  Yup, which brings up.. has that ever been done?

JamesJM158January 03, 2021 05:34PM

  That underscores the point

waterfield150January 03, 2021 06:28PM

  you don't think in all of NFL history...

JamesJM147January 03, 2021 06:36PM

  Re: you don't think in all of NFL history...

waterfield146January 03, 2021 07:07PM

  I was... but...

JamesJM143January 03, 2021 07:11PM

  Re: I was... but...

waterfield167January 03, 2021 07:27PM

  I both agree and disagree, waterfield...

Rams43198January 03, 2021 05:21PM

  I just see not chance of Goff not starting next week...

JamesJM176January 03, 2021 05:26PM

  Re: I just see not chance of Goff not starting next week...

waterfield159January 03, 2021 05:39PM

  I think that's the major part of it as well. (nm)

JamesJM386January 03, 2021 05:39PM

  Re: I just see not chance of Goff not starting next week...

Rams43224January 03, 2021 05:58PM

  Darned good question... hell, I'm incredulous that he is...

JamesJM159January 03, 2021 06:06PM

  Re: Darned good question... hell, I'm incredulous that he is...

waterfield165January 03, 2021 06:31PM

  Could be.... true, but I don't think Goff

JamesJM274January 03, 2021 06:59PM

  Re: Could be.... true, but I don't think Goff

waterfield195January 03, 2021 07:12PM

  Re: I both agree and disagree, waterfield...

waterfield174January 03, 2021 05:28PM

  Re: Wolford's stock rose today

no name201January 03, 2021 05:33PM

  Re: Wolford's stock rose today

waterfield174January 03, 2021 06:33PM

  Re: Wolford's stock rose today

Barf33153January 03, 2021 08:27PM

  Re: Wolford's stock rose today

LMU93145January 04, 2021 03:38AM

  64 QB rating and offense generated 0 touchdowns

Rams_81258January 04, 2021 03:55AM

  Probably buys him a roster spot next year

Hazlet Hacksaw188January 04, 2021 04:12AM