January 03, 2021 05:57PM
Wolford made yet another hohum offensive effort palatable. Inconsistent line play, penalties, drops, overthrows under throws inconsistent running and play calling along with QB miscues coupled with some offschedule and also prescribed bootlegs with great results. Wolford was playing with house money and a mandate not to squeze the ball and the pass plays, routes and options demonstrated that McVay recognized that without Goff he still needed to find a way to exploit the Cards and we did sorta. We leveraged complementary football to secure a win and we did not try to sit on our lead. I credit everyone for this result but just like Brees is important to the Saints. Goff is important to Rams. Now Goff is no Brees but he can beat and out play Brees when his teamates are on their A game.

With Wolford we have a viable back-up perhaps. I have liked him in PS but I am not sure if he can build enough from today to carry into next week. We saw more of Jeffereson but still not getting the type of WR explosion I had hoped. It is nice that we did get to see that Jefferson can be more than what we have been shown so far.

I feel like if there is no Goff, I feel like any fan of any other team with a back-up that shows any promise hoping for a victory.

I am not confident Goff will be healthy next week. Its not just the throwing but accepting the snaps so that is where I think we are or should be concerned with. It has to be the turnovers by Goff via fumbles and ints.



Los Angeles Rams

Rap on.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Wolford's stock rose today

waterfield1173January 03, 2021 04:42PM

  Hmm, disagree with a lot of that...

JamesJM417January 03, 2021 04:58PM

  yup me too

Speed_Kills269January 03, 2021 05:03PM

  O course you do.

waterfield261January 03, 2021 05:25PM

  I think you are on to something and its fair

BumRap195January 03, 2021 05:57PM

  Re: I think you are on to something and its fair

Ekern55174January 03, 2021 06:00PM

  And it will likely be wet and raining in Seattle...

NorCalRamFan243January 03, 2021 08:17PM

  thumb and throwing a wet ball are one thing......

21Dog193January 04, 2021 05:14AM

  Ok waterfield nm

Speed_Kills376January 03, 2021 06:05PM

  Re: Hmm, disagree with a lot of that...

waterfield218January 03, 2021 05:16PM

  But it's NOT, Waterfield... just 'recency bias'...

JamesJM206January 03, 2021 05:22PM

  Re: But it's NOT, Waterfield... just 'recency bias'...

waterfield429January 03, 2021 05:46PM

  Well, I absolutely do agree he's not Allen, or Wilson..

JamesJM307January 03, 2021 05:49PM

  Re: But it's NOT, Waterfield... just 'recency bias'...

waterfield139January 03, 2021 07:15PM

  Yeah, Kroenke will fire them. ROTFL

max203January 03, 2021 05:19PM

  Well, in fairness I think Waterfield used a little hyperbole there... (nm)

JamesJM168January 03, 2021 05:23PM

  Same Logic says Goff will start and not lose job

BumRap174January 03, 2021 05:31PM

  Yup, which brings up.. has that ever been done?

JamesJM158January 03, 2021 05:34PM

  That underscores the point

waterfield150January 03, 2021 06:28PM

  you don't think in all of NFL history...

JamesJM147January 03, 2021 06:36PM

  Re: you don't think in all of NFL history...

waterfield146January 03, 2021 07:07PM

  I was... but...

JamesJM143January 03, 2021 07:11PM

  Re: I was... but...

waterfield167January 03, 2021 07:27PM

  I both agree and disagree, waterfield...

Rams43198January 03, 2021 05:21PM

  I just see not chance of Goff not starting next week...

JamesJM176January 03, 2021 05:26PM

  Re: I just see not chance of Goff not starting next week...

waterfield159January 03, 2021 05:39PM

  I think that's the major part of it as well. (nm)

JamesJM386January 03, 2021 05:39PM

  Re: I just see not chance of Goff not starting next week...

Rams43224January 03, 2021 05:58PM

  Darned good question... hell, I'm incredulous that he is...

JamesJM159January 03, 2021 06:06PM

  Re: Darned good question... hell, I'm incredulous that he is...

waterfield165January 03, 2021 06:31PM

  Could be.... true, but I don't think Goff

JamesJM274January 03, 2021 06:59PM

  Re: Could be.... true, but I don't think Goff

waterfield196January 03, 2021 07:12PM

  Re: I both agree and disagree, waterfield...

waterfield175January 03, 2021 05:28PM

  Re: Wolford's stock rose today

no name202January 03, 2021 05:33PM

  Re: Wolford's stock rose today

waterfield174January 03, 2021 06:33PM

  Re: Wolford's stock rose today

Barf33154January 03, 2021 08:27PM

  Re: Wolford's stock rose today

LMU93145January 04, 2021 03:38AM

  64 QB rating and offense generated 0 touchdowns

Rams_81258January 04, 2021 03:55AM

  Probably buys him a roster spot next year

Hazlet Hacksaw188January 04, 2021 04:12AM