January 03, 2021 05:16PM
Keep in mind Az was hurting today. Their star qb was totally ineffective due to his injury and was on the sideline for a lot of the game-or in the training room. Their HOF receiver Fitzgerald did not play. I believe Goff would have run up the score, if healthy. If he is healthy and the Rams choose Wolford to start against Seattle I will be shocked but will be a little more comfortable than I was when Wolford threw his first pass. Just as teams are figuring out how to play Goff they will do the same with Wolford. What any of us need is to see Wolford in several games. By that time it's my opinion we won't be seeing him running around like Josh Allen or Wison and others.

The argument for Wolford starting over a healthy Goff, after one game, is nothing more than recency bias. Recency bias gives "greater importance to the most recent event. Like the guy who lives in Minnesota and every winter experiences 100 ft of snow. So one summer he goes out and buys a 4 wd vehicle. The following winter -no snow-. His response: "I never should have bought that 4WD. "

Bottom line here is that the entire Ram hierarchy is smarter than the sit Goff start Wolford posters here. In the future, maybe, but not after one game.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Wolford's stock rose today

waterfield1174January 03, 2021 04:42PM

  Hmm, disagree with a lot of that...

JamesJM418January 03, 2021 04:58PM

  yup me too

Speed_Kills269January 03, 2021 05:03PM

  O course you do.

waterfield261January 03, 2021 05:25PM

  I think you are on to something and its fair

BumRap196January 03, 2021 05:57PM

  Re: I think you are on to something and its fair

Ekern55174January 03, 2021 06:00PM

  And it will likely be wet and raining in Seattle...

NorCalRamFan243January 03, 2021 08:17PM

  thumb and throwing a wet ball are one thing......

21Dog193January 04, 2021 05:14AM

  Ok waterfield nm

Speed_Kills377January 03, 2021 06:05PM

  Re: Hmm, disagree with a lot of that...

waterfield218January 03, 2021 05:16PM

  But it's NOT, Waterfield... just 'recency bias'...

JamesJM207January 03, 2021 05:22PM

  Re: But it's NOT, Waterfield... just 'recency bias'...

waterfield429January 03, 2021 05:46PM

  Well, I absolutely do agree he's not Allen, or Wilson..

JamesJM307January 03, 2021 05:49PM

  Re: But it's NOT, Waterfield... just 'recency bias'...

waterfield139January 03, 2021 07:15PM

  Yeah, Kroenke will fire them. ROTFL

max203January 03, 2021 05:19PM

  Well, in fairness I think Waterfield used a little hyperbole there... (nm)

JamesJM168January 03, 2021 05:23PM

  Same Logic says Goff will start and not lose job

BumRap174January 03, 2021 05:31PM

  Yup, which brings up.. has that ever been done?

JamesJM158January 03, 2021 05:34PM

  That underscores the point

waterfield150January 03, 2021 06:28PM

  you don't think in all of NFL history...

JamesJM147January 03, 2021 06:36PM

  Re: you don't think in all of NFL history...

waterfield146January 03, 2021 07:07PM

  I was... but...

JamesJM143January 03, 2021 07:11PM

  Re: I was... but...

waterfield167January 03, 2021 07:27PM

  I both agree and disagree, waterfield...

Rams43199January 03, 2021 05:21PM

  I just see not chance of Goff not starting next week...

JamesJM177January 03, 2021 05:26PM

  Re: I just see not chance of Goff not starting next week...

waterfield159January 03, 2021 05:39PM

  I think that's the major part of it as well. (nm)

JamesJM386January 03, 2021 05:39PM

  Re: I just see not chance of Goff not starting next week...

Rams43224January 03, 2021 05:58PM

  Darned good question... hell, I'm incredulous that he is...

JamesJM160January 03, 2021 06:06PM

  Re: Darned good question... hell, I'm incredulous that he is...

waterfield165January 03, 2021 06:31PM

  Could be.... true, but I don't think Goff

JamesJM274January 03, 2021 06:59PM

  Re: Could be.... true, but I don't think Goff

waterfield196January 03, 2021 07:12PM

  Re: I both agree and disagree, waterfield...

waterfield175January 03, 2021 05:28PM

  Re: Wolford's stock rose today

no name202January 03, 2021 05:33PM

  Re: Wolford's stock rose today

waterfield175January 03, 2021 06:33PM

  Re: Wolford's stock rose today

Barf33154January 03, 2021 08:27PM

  Re: Wolford's stock rose today

LMU93145January 04, 2021 03:38AM

  64 QB rating and offense generated 0 touchdowns

Rams_81258January 04, 2021 03:55AM

  Probably buys him a roster spot next year

Hazlet Hacksaw188January 04, 2021 04:12AM