Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Stat shows Rams O-line wasn’t as bad as expected in running game...

July 23, 2020 04:34AM
Stat shows Rams' O-line wasn't as bad as it seemed in the running game

[theramswire.usatoday.com]

Cameron DaSilva

Could it be possible that the Rams’ offensive line wasn’t actually the problem in the running game? According to one metric, it seems that way.

Next Gen Stats developed a new statistic that measures an offensive line’s effectiveness at creating yards for its running backs. It’s called expected rushing yards per carry, putting into perspective how successful a line was at creating opportunities in the running game compared to other units across the NFL.

The Rams surprisingly ranked ninth in the NFL despite finishing 26th in rushing yards and 18th in attempts last season. The offensive line had an expected yards per carry (xYPC) of 4.31 compared to the actual team average of only 3.7 yards per carry.

Here’s a snippet of Next Gen Stats’ evaluation of the Rams from last season:

The Rams should really be commended for landing on this list, especially after losing Joe Noteboom early in the season and needing a replacement so badly, they swung a deal (which could end up being a steal) with the Browns for Austin Corbett in the middle of the season. This might also be the most damning piece of evidence related to Todd Gurley’s future, as we covered above with Atlanta. The league average in xYPC was 4.18 last season, so the Rams’ mark of 4.31 is nothing to scoff at. Yet, the Rams weren’t able to break 4 yards per carry with Gurley (and friends) in the backfield.

The Rams cut Gurley for multiple reasons, not exclusively because of his knee issues or bloated contract. It was a combination of the two, in addition to his regression from 2018 to 2019. He simply didn’t do enough to create yards on his own, and this metric from Next Gen Stats reinforces that idea.

The Rams have to hope Cam Akers and Darrell Henderson, as well as a dash of Malcolm Brown, will improve the running game. It remains to be seen how that committee will play out when the season begins, but the Rams plan to run the ball more often – and hopefully, more effectively in 2020.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Stat shows Rams O-line wasn’t as bad as expected in running game...

Rams43599July 23, 2020 04:34AM

  My eyeballs say Gurley was awful

Suh-weet!252July 23, 2020 08:02AM

  Re: My eyeballs say Gurley was awful

Ohiorams223July 23, 2020 08:58AM

  Re: Some of these new stats are nonsense

merlin219July 23, 2020 08:30AM

  Re: I said that all along

Speed_Kills229July 23, 2020 08:37AM

  sacks are on the qb

zn224July 23, 2020 08:57AM

  Re: Yes and McVay factors in too in this

merlin189July 23, 2020 09:24AM

  Re: sacks are on the qb

Rams43290July 23, 2020 09:29AM

  Re: again ... I’m flexible

Speed_Kills330July 23, 2020 10:23AM

  Re: Goff

merlin199July 23, 2020 12:27PM

  this is exactly how I saw it

zn257July 23, 2020 01:53PM

  Rams were one missed FG against Seattle away from the playoffs

NewMexicoRam174July 23, 2020 03:48PM

  Re: that’s a reasonable take

Speed_Kills147July 24, 2020 05:58PM

  Re: again ... I’m flexible

Old Goat232July 23, 2020 02:49PM

  Re: I don't disagree

Speed_Kills140July 24, 2020 01:15AM

  Re: ESPN says the 2019 Rams OL was 23rd in pass pro

AlbaNY_Ram181July 23, 2020 09:12AM

  Re: ESPN says the 2019 Rams OL was 23rd in pass pro

zn198July 23, 2020 09:17AM

  Re: ESPN says the 2019 Rams OL was 23rd in pass pro

AlbaNY_Ram192July 23, 2020 09:38AM

  Re: ESPN says the 2019 Rams OL was 23rd in pass pro

Rams43205July 23, 2020 09:43AM

  Re: I don’t disagree with either of you

Speed_Kills276July 23, 2020 10:26AM

  I would like to know how they figure that

NewMexicoRam187July 23, 2020 01:19PM

  Running the ball more effectively is required to run more

Rams_81168July 24, 2020 02:14AM