May 24, 2019 06:50AM
Quote
zn
Quote
max

Whether Florio is insincere or not doesn't preclude him from wanting attention..

And the truth is no one is a mind reader so they have no idea what his motives are. I will say this though. If you;re a writer who craves attention, how high does writing about Goff rank on your list of topics that will get you national, widespread attention?

If we did a survey of hot topics being discussed in the sports media right now, does Goff even make the top 100? Is writing about Goff right now a big career making move?

And then there's this. We;re a Rams board. Anything said about Goff, we will be sensitive about. What are the odds a writer will be dismissively critical of Goff, without at least someone making it ad hominem and making the writer the issue? They're pretty high, right?

In reading sports media, no one knows a writer's motives. Those who claim to are the same as everyone else--they have no idea. They may claim they do but then that's just a type of rhetoric we see from fans...and that's all it is.

Meanwhile, I disagree with Florio, and I think he's wrong, and I think the idea that the Rams are hesitant about signing him to a 2nd contract is pretty misguided. So my disagreement is with the claim, and the argument. IMO bashing the writer adds nothing of value to that.

...

All I said is that he wants attention. And who wouldn't? Thats his business. He wants clicks and he gets them in all different ways. So now in the middle of May he calls into the Dan Patrick show and throws out his opinion on a big market QB who just lost the SB. He isn't wasting his time. He's not talking about Marcus Mariotta is he?

You seem to be getting locked in to something that someone else said about Florio and applying it to every poster. Im not bashing Florio for wanting attention. That aint me. This is regardless of whether I agree with him or not.

Also, the claim that you aren't seeking attention when you take a critical position on Goff because there are other bigger names to criticize is actually illogical.

Thats like saying I would never eat at an inexpensive restaurant if I could afford to eat at an expensive one.

And whether you agree or disagree with Florio is irrelevant to this discussion.



~ max ~
“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/24/2019 06:52AM by max.
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Florio: I would not be surprised if Goff doesn't get a second contract with the Rams."

RamBill1013May 23, 2019 02:58PM

  Re: Florio: I would not be surprised if Goff doesn't get a second contract with the Rams."

zn512May 23, 2019 03:16PM

  A little Vinny on this...

Rams43479May 23, 2019 03:19PM

  Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

Anonymous User459May 23, 2019 04:08PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

cool_hand_luke257May 23, 2019 05:00PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

zn241May 23, 2019 09:04PM

  Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract: Well Played

Anonymous User353May 24, 2019 10:00AM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract: Well Played

zn231May 24, 2019 10:31AM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract: Well Played

Anonymous User193May 24, 2019 10:43AM

  I think people have valid points to be concerned about Goff...

jemach103May 24, 2019 01:43PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

cool_hand_luke295May 24, 2019 02:28PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

zn104May 24, 2019 04:28PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

cool_hand_luke95May 24, 2019 06:05PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

zn278May 24, 2019 08:11PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

cool_hand_luke195May 24, 2019 10:14PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

zn192May 25, 2019 07:03AM

  Losing Kupp was major. Just major.

NewMexicoRam168May 23, 2019 05:22PM

  Re: So he collapsed because he didn’t have Kupp?

Speed_Kills208May 23, 2019 05:29PM

  Re: So he collapsed because he didn’t have Kupp?

jim beam307May 24, 2019 07:25AM

  and the OL too

zn131May 23, 2019 09:38PM

  Re: and the OL too

waterfield125May 24, 2019 10:00AM

  Re: Excellent post

Speed_Kills319May 23, 2019 05:23PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

Classicalwit141May 23, 2019 06:46PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

zn131May 23, 2019 09:48PM

  ok hes not perfect

PHDram169May 23, 2019 07:19PM

  I think there are two different things here.

Saguaro160May 24, 2019 04:39AM

  Re: I think there are two different things here.

zn263May 24, 2019 05:26AM

  I don't give him the same leeway you do.

Saguaro112May 24, 2019 06:07AM

  Re: I don't give him the same leeway you do.

zn119May 24, 2019 07:33AM

  Re: been saying this forever...

spagsbacker216May 23, 2019 05:04PM

  Re: been saying this forever...Actually yes it is

BumRap119May 24, 2019 09:46AM

  Beyond stupid...

Ram49144May 23, 2019 07:31PM

  Florio has to say stuff like that to stay relevant

Rampage2K-147May 23, 2019 08:06PM

  Re: Florio has to say stuff like that to stay relevant

zn250May 23, 2019 09:59PM

  Re: Florio has to say stuff like that to stay relevant

Killrazor355May 24, 2019 12:47AM

  Re: Now this I agree with

Speed_Kills308May 24, 2019 03:03AM

  Re: Now this I agree with

Rampage2K-118May 24, 2019 05:58PM

  They are not mutually exclusive

max126May 24, 2019 04:59AM

  that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

zn163May 24, 2019 05:10AM

  Huh? I didn't bash the writer

max314May 24, 2019 06:50AM

  I didn't say you did

zn161May 24, 2019 07:25AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

Rams43183May 24, 2019 08:20AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

zn203May 24, 2019 08:34AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

Rams43291May 24, 2019 09:01AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

zn102May 24, 2019 09:11AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

dzrams115May 24, 2019 01:14PM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

Rams43285May 24, 2019 02:09PM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

dzrams113May 24, 2019 03:44PM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

Rams43122May 25, 2019 06:02AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

zn132May 25, 2019 07:43AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

Rams43152May 25, 2019 08:19AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

Rampage2K-166May 25, 2019 11:05AM

  Re: I think what you might be missing

Speed_Kills152May 25, 2019 11:44AM

  Re: Agreed on this summary....

dzrams105May 25, 2019 12:04PM

  Re: I think what you might be missing

Rampage2K-211May 25, 2019 12:07PM

  Re: I think what you might be missing

zn366May 25, 2019 12:27PM

  Re: I think what you might be missing

Rampage2K-107May 25, 2019 12:39PM

  Re: I think what you might be missing

zn76May 25, 2019 06:00PM

  Ace in the hole

moklerman168May 25, 2019 12:54PM

  Re: Ace in the hole

Rampage2K-143May 25, 2019 01:15PM

  Good work dz.... zn too

Speed_Kills106May 25, 2019 09:51AM

  He says Dak over Goff

no name219May 24, 2019 06:04AM

  Re: He says Dak over Goff

Classicalwit163May 24, 2019 08:30AM

  Re: He says Dak over Goff

zn197May 24, 2019 08:44AM

  Re: He says Dak over Goff

max129May 24, 2019 09:07AM

  Re: He says Dak over Goff

zn133May 24, 2019 09:16AM

  2 thoughts here

max162May 25, 2019 05:00AM

  Re: 2 thoughts here

zn111May 25, 2019 06:53AM

  the Bortles treatment

max127May 25, 2019 07:20AM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

zn224May 25, 2019 07:37AM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

max233May 25, 2019 08:28AM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

zn110May 25, 2019 09:19AM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

max193May 25, 2019 12:21PM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

zn216May 25, 2019 12:56PM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

max150May 25, 2019 01:17PM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

zn654May 25, 2019 02:00PM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

max168May 25, 2019 04:06PM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

zn175May 25, 2019 04:25PM

  Re: Why wouldn't that be expected?

dzrams193May 25, 2019 02:18PM

  Re: Good theoretical question...one I've alluded to on here...

dzrams242May 25, 2019 11:58AM

  Re: Good theoretical question...one I've alluded to on here...

zn418May 25, 2019 01:12PM

  Re: He says Dak was not a 1st rounder either

BumRap184May 24, 2019 09:52AM

  Re: He says Dak over Goff

cool_hand_luke105May 24, 2019 02:30PM

  Totally agree

Los Angeles Lenny191May 24, 2019 10:54AM

  Me: "I would be surprised if Florio is right."

alyoshamucci221May 24, 2019 11:19AM

  Even if he doesn't believe in Goff

no name170May 24, 2019 07:32PM

  Re: Even if he doesn't believe in Goff

cool_hand_luke127May 24, 2019 09:11PM

  here is McVay on Goff recently

Rampage2K-152May 25, 2019 11:11AM