Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

They are not mutually exclusive

May 24, 2019 04:59AM
Quote
zn
Quote
Rampage2K-
Otherwise nobody would talk about this clown.... it worked as we are talking about the clown right now


Move along

Sorry, but, talking about Jared Goff--positively or negatively--is just not going to make someone relevant. Or irrelevant. At this point Goff is just another one of the 32 starting qbs. Writers who crave attention will talk about other players, not Goff.

Florio IMO is wrong, but he's not insincere. Bashing the character of the messenger in this case is all just kind of beside the point.

Goff has to prove them wrong. Until that happens, people will say things.

Whether Florio is insincere or not doesn't preclude him from wanting attention.

He could be sincere and want attention or he could be insincere and want attention.

And I reject your claim that "Writers who crave attention will talk about other players, not Goff"

They will talk about anybody to get attention. And Goff does play in the LA market, so he will get talked about more than say a QB in Nashville.

I think its naive to think Florio isn't seeking attention. The more people talk about what he says the more clicks he gets the more money he makes. Believe or not, there are people who seek attention to make money.

Still, these are just opinions of writers. They don't have any more value than mine or yours.

The bigger question is what do all these negative opinions reflect. Simply that Goff had some poor games toward the end of the season and also in the SB. Recency bias is a huge factor in these opinions. He played extremely well in the NFC Champ game, but that got overshadowed by the penalty fiasco. So its logical to expect negative opinions at this point in the year.

This stuff is mostly noise in May. When the season starts and Goff looks great everyone will forget what was said in May.



~ max ~
“The consciousness of good intentions disdains ambiguity.” - Alexander Hamilton
SubjectAuthorViewsPosted

  Florio: I would not be surprised if Goff doesn't get a second contract with the Rams."

RamBill1012May 23, 2019 02:58PM

  Re: Florio: I would not be surprised if Goff doesn't get a second contract with the Rams."

zn511May 23, 2019 03:16PM

  A little Vinny on this...

Rams43477May 23, 2019 03:19PM

  Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

Anonymous User458May 23, 2019 04:08PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

cool_hand_luke256May 23, 2019 05:00PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

zn241May 23, 2019 09:04PM

  Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract: Well Played

Anonymous User351May 24, 2019 10:00AM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract: Well Played

zn229May 24, 2019 10:31AM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract: Well Played

Anonymous User192May 24, 2019 10:43AM

  I think people have valid points to be concerned about Goff...

jemach102May 24, 2019 01:43PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

cool_hand_luke295May 24, 2019 02:28PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

zn102May 24, 2019 04:28PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

cool_hand_luke95May 24, 2019 06:05PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

zn278May 24, 2019 08:11PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

cool_hand_luke194May 24, 2019 10:14PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

zn190May 25, 2019 07:03AM

  Losing Kupp was major. Just major.

NewMexicoRam167May 23, 2019 05:22PM

  Re: So he collapsed because he didn’t have Kupp?

Speed_Kills207May 23, 2019 05:29PM

  Re: So he collapsed because he didn’t have Kupp?

jim beam303May 24, 2019 07:25AM

  and the OL too

zn129May 23, 2019 09:38PM

  Re: and the OL too

waterfield125May 24, 2019 10:00AM

  Re: Excellent post

Speed_Kills317May 23, 2019 05:23PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

Classicalwit139May 23, 2019 06:46PM

  Re: Florio: Not surprised if Goff doesn't get a 2nd contract with Rams

zn130May 23, 2019 09:48PM

  ok hes not perfect

PHDram168May 23, 2019 07:19PM

  I think there are two different things here.

Saguaro158May 24, 2019 04:39AM

  Re: I think there are two different things here.

zn262May 24, 2019 05:26AM

  I don't give him the same leeway you do.

Saguaro112May 24, 2019 06:07AM

  Re: I don't give him the same leeway you do.

zn117May 24, 2019 07:33AM

  Re: been saying this forever...

spagsbacker216May 23, 2019 05:04PM

  Re: been saying this forever...Actually yes it is

BumRap117May 24, 2019 09:46AM

  Beyond stupid...

Ram49143May 23, 2019 07:31PM

  Florio has to say stuff like that to stay relevant

Rampage2K-145May 23, 2019 08:06PM

  Re: Florio has to say stuff like that to stay relevant

zn249May 23, 2019 09:59PM

  Re: Florio has to say stuff like that to stay relevant

Killrazor352May 24, 2019 12:47AM

  Re: Now this I agree with

Speed_Kills306May 24, 2019 03:03AM

  Re: Now this I agree with

Rampage2K-117May 24, 2019 05:58PM

  They are not mutually exclusive

max124May 24, 2019 04:59AM

  that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

zn163May 24, 2019 05:10AM

  Huh? I didn't bash the writer

max311May 24, 2019 06:50AM

  I didn't say you did

zn160May 24, 2019 07:25AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

Rams43181May 24, 2019 08:20AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

zn203May 24, 2019 08:34AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

Rams43290May 24, 2019 09:01AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

zn102May 24, 2019 09:11AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

dzrams114May 24, 2019 01:14PM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

Rams43284May 24, 2019 02:09PM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

dzrams112May 24, 2019 03:44PM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

Rams43122May 25, 2019 06:02AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

zn130May 25, 2019 07:43AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

Rams43152May 25, 2019 08:19AM

  Re: that's the nature of ad hominem attacks

Rampage2K-166May 25, 2019 11:05AM

  Re: I think what you might be missing

Speed_Kills152May 25, 2019 11:44AM

  Re: Agreed on this summary....

dzrams105May 25, 2019 12:04PM

  Re: I think what you might be missing

Rampage2K-211May 25, 2019 12:07PM

  Re: I think what you might be missing

zn365May 25, 2019 12:27PM

  Re: I think what you might be missing

Rampage2K-107May 25, 2019 12:39PM

  Re: I think what you might be missing

zn76May 25, 2019 06:00PM

  Ace in the hole

moklerman168May 25, 2019 12:54PM

  Re: Ace in the hole

Rampage2K-142May 25, 2019 01:15PM

  Good work dz.... zn too

Speed_Kills106May 25, 2019 09:51AM

  He says Dak over Goff

no name218May 24, 2019 06:04AM

  Re: He says Dak over Goff

Classicalwit163May 24, 2019 08:30AM

  Re: He says Dak over Goff

zn196May 24, 2019 08:44AM

  Re: He says Dak over Goff

max127May 24, 2019 09:07AM

  Re: He says Dak over Goff

zn132May 24, 2019 09:16AM

  2 thoughts here

max160May 25, 2019 05:00AM

  Re: 2 thoughts here

zn110May 25, 2019 06:53AM

  the Bortles treatment

max126May 25, 2019 07:20AM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

zn224May 25, 2019 07:37AM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

max231May 25, 2019 08:28AM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

zn109May 25, 2019 09:19AM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

max193May 25, 2019 12:21PM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

zn215May 25, 2019 12:56PM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

max149May 25, 2019 01:17PM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

zn651May 25, 2019 02:00PM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

max168May 25, 2019 04:06PM

  Re: the Bortles treatment

zn174May 25, 2019 04:25PM

  Re: Why wouldn't that be expected?

dzrams193May 25, 2019 02:18PM

  Re: Good theoretical question...one I've alluded to on here...

dzrams241May 25, 2019 11:58AM

  Re: Good theoretical question...one I've alluded to on here...

zn418May 25, 2019 01:12PM

  Re: He says Dak was not a 1st rounder either

BumRap183May 24, 2019 09:52AM

  Re: He says Dak over Goff

cool_hand_luke105May 24, 2019 02:30PM

  Totally agree

Los Angeles Lenny189May 24, 2019 10:54AM

  Me: "I would be surprised if Florio is right."

alyoshamucci220May 24, 2019 11:19AM

  Even if he doesn't believe in Goff

no name169May 24, 2019 07:32PM

  Re: Even if he doesn't believe in Goff

cool_hand_luke127May 24, 2019 09:11PM

  here is McVay on Goff recently

Rampage2K-151May 25, 2019 11:11AM